Jakub Mensik vs Arthur FilsMiami Masters Quarter-final

Miami Masters · ATP · Quarter-final
#18ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 19 March 2025
hard
#24ATP
2001ELO
1930Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Mensik J.
7-6 6-1
Fils A.
Mensik J.
7762
Fils A.
6510

Jakub Mensik defeated Arthur Fils 7-6 6-1 in the Miami Masters quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Fils came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 128. Jakub Mensik claimed a first win over Arthur Fils in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jakub Mensik came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

02
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-16DohaSFhardArthur Fils6-4 7-6(4)
2024-12-18Next Gen FinalsRRhardArthur Fils4-2 4-3(4) 4-2

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Fils A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mensik J.Fils A.
42
Serve
56
51
Return
30

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
55%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
88
89
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Slight edge
77
70
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
98
Tiebreaks·Even
99
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1893
Surface ELO
5.8+37 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 2001
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.5
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.8
Minutes 14d
5.2
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Even
86
90

Mensik J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Fils A.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 48%