Colton Smith vs Borna Gojo — Cleveland CH Final

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Final
USA2
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Smith C.
6-4 7-5
Gojo B.
Smith C.
672
Gojo B.
450

Colton Smith defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 7-5 in the Cleveland CH final on hard. Colton Smith extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-24WimbledonSFgrassColton Smith4-6 4-6

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
67%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
70%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
11.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith C.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
62
53
Break points saved·Even
94
95
Break points won·Dominant
52
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Gojo B.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1566
Surface ELO
7.1+97 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1577
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1683
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.0
Surface form
7.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
5.9
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Gojo B.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Smith C.: 18 days rest · Gojo B.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63