Patrick Kypson vs Colton Smith — San Diego CH Quarter-final

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Patrick Kypson
USA3
Patrick Kypson
#113ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
USA7
Colton Smith
#186ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
Kypson P.
7-6 6-0
Smith C.
Kypson P.
7762
Smith C.
6500

Patrick Kypson defeated Colton Smith 7-6 6-0 in the San Diego CH quarter-final on hard. Patrick Kypson claimed a first win over Colton Smith in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-27Canada MastersQ1hardColton Smith6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Smith C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Smith C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Smith C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
62
Break points saved·Even
93
94
Break points won·Slight edge
41
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Smith C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+46 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1566
6.7Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1577
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.7
Surface form
3.0
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Smith C.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
100

Kypson P.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Smith C.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Korda S.[1]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-46-1
Korda S.[1]
Kypson P.[3]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[1]
Draxl L.[6]
7-646-4
Kypson P.[3]
Smith C.[7]
7-656-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Krueger M.
6-32-66-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-4
R16
Korda S.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-24-66-3
Draxl L.[6]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
Kypson P.[3]
Johns G.
7-646-2
Smith C.[7]
Bicknell B.
5-77-636-1
Svajda Z.[4]
Smith K.
7-626-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Fenty A.
6-41-67-62
Hijikata R.[2]
Tomic B.
3-66-46-3
Krueger M.
Samuel T.
6-46-4
R32
Johns G.
Poling K.
6-27-65
Bicknell B.
Rybakov A.
6-47-5
Smith C.[7]
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Korda S.[1]
Milavsky D.
6-47-5
Ilagan A.
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
6-17-5
Svajda T.
Braswell M.
6-26-2
Draxl L.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[3]
Zink T.
7-656-1
Samuel T.
Boyer T.[8]
6-35-76-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-24-67-65
Krueger M.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Smith K.
Perot R.
6-37-66
Svajda Z.[4]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Fenty A.
Artnak B.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Corwin F.
7-666-3
Hijikata R.[2]
Dostanic S.
2-66-36-2