Anna Bondar vs Ella Seidel — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#74WTA
1735ELO
1654Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Ella Seidel
GER
Ella Seidel
#100WTA
1616ELO
1614Hard ELO
21 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
Bondar A.
6-0 6-1
Seidel E.
Bondar A.
662
Seidel E.
010

Anna Bondar defeated Ella Seidel 6-0 6-1 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #74, defending last year's round of 16. Anna Bondar extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-01Cluj-NapocaR32hardAnna Bondar4-6 7-6(6) 6-0
2024-07-15BudapestR16clayElla Seidel7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Bondar A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Seidel E.

Seidel E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bondar A.Seidel E.
32
Serve
20
27
Return
9

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bondar A.Seidel E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bondar A.Seidel E.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
77
Break points won·Slight edge
77
70
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
40
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
78
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bondar A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Seidel E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+41 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1614
6.4Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1616
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
5.9
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
8.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bondar A.Seidel E.
Freshness·Even
96
98

Bondar A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Seidel E.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°COvercast
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 54%

Draw

Final
Cocciaretto E.
Jovic I.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Jovic I.[3]
Preston T.
4-66-46-1
Cocciaretto E.
Ruzic A.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Preston T.
Raducanu E.[1]
6-26-4
Cocciaretto E.
Bondar A.
6-26-2
Jovic I.[3]
Linette M.[8]
6-36-756-2
Ruzic A.
Danilovic O.
6-36-3
R16
Raducanu E.[1]
Frech M.
W/O
Bondar A.
Maria T.[6]
7-677-5
Jovic I.[3]
Zarazua R.
6-16-2
Ruzic A.
Sierra S.
7-56-4
Cocciaretto E.
Li A.[4]
1-67-57-5
Danilovic O.
Stearns P.
7-626-1
Linette M.[8]
Wang X.
6-17-5
Preston T.
Sramkova R.
6-46-1
R32
Jovic I.[3]
Tjen J.
6-06-1
Zarazua R.
Baptiste H.
6-756-36-3
Danilovic O.
Kessler M.[2]
4-66-46-4
Maria T.[6]
Williams V.
6-46-3
Ruzic A.
Arango E.[7]
7-56-1
Linette M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-31-66-1
Stearns P.
Krejcikova B.
6-41-67-64
Preston T.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[5]
6-47-64
Wang X.
Gibson T.
6-26-3
Cocciaretto E.
Shimizu A.
6-36-4
Li A.[4]
Volynets K.
4-67-56-2
Raducanu E.[1]
Osorio C.
6-37-62
Frech M.
Jacquemot E.
6-46-0
Bondar A.
Seidel E.
6-06-1
Sierra S.
Mcnally C.
1-66-46-1
Sramkova R.
Gracheva V.
6-44-66-2