Ella Seidel vs Anna Bondar — Budapest Round of 16

Budapest · WTA · Round of 16
Ella Seidel
GER
Ella Seidel
#99WTA
1616ELO
1526Clay ELO
21 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1734Clay ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
Seidel E.
7-5 7-5
Bondar A.
Seidel E.
772
Bondar A.
550

Ella Seidel defeated Anna Bondar 7-5 7-5 in the Budapest round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #73, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 16. Ella Seidel claimed a first win over Anna Bondar in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-01Cluj-NapocaR32hardAnna Bondar4-6 7-6(6) 6-0
2026-01-12HobartR32hardAnna Bondar6-0 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Seidel E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Bondar A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Seidel E.

Serve advantage — Bondar A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Seidel E.Bondar A.
—
Serve
54
—
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Seidel E.Bondar A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (136 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seidel E.Bondar A.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
88
Break points won·Slight edge
70
77
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seidel E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bondar A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Clay Elo 1526
Surface ELO
7.6+208 Clay Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1616
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1735
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seidel E.Bondar A.
Freshness·Even
98
97

Seidel E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Bondar A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Shnaider D.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sasnovich A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-33-67-5
Shnaider D.[1]
Lys E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Sramkova R.
4-66-37-65
Schmiedlova A.
Avanesyan E.
2-66-36-2
Shnaider D.[1]
Seidel E.
6-46-2
Sasnovich A.
Lamens S.
6-42-66-4
R16
Lys E.
Pera B.
7-664-1
Seidel E.
Bondar A.
7-57-5
Lamens S.
Monnet C.
6-46-0
Sasnovich A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-4
Schmiedlova A.
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
2-66-26-2
Shnaider D.[1]
Makarova E.
6-36-3
Avanesyan E.
Masarova R.
2-67-56-1
Sramkova R.
Wang X.[3]
7-646-3
R32
Seidel E.
Uchijima M.[7]
6-11-0
Shnaider D.[1]
Stollar F.
6-33-66-4
Sramkova R.
Bulgaru M.
6-34-66-4
Lys E.
Podoroska N.[6]
6-36-0
Avanesyan E.
Frech M.[5]
7-656-4
Masarova R.
Szabanin N.
6-26-3
Pera B.
Korpatsch T.
7-52-66-2
Bondar A.
Danilovic O.
7-656-4
Makarova E.
Babos T.
6-36-1
Wang X.[3]
Todoni A.
7-647-5
Schmiedlova A.
Rakhimova K.
3-66-46-0
Monnet C.
Toth A.
6-16-1
Timofeeva M.
Waltert S.
7-57-63
Sasnovich A.
Tomova V.[2]
2-66-26-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
Topalova G.
4-66-37-5
Lamens S.
Gracheva V.[8]
6-36-0