Learner Tien vs Cameron Norrie — Metz Final

Metz · ATP · Final
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#17ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 2 November 2025
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR7
Cameron Norrie
#29ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Tien L.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Norrie C.
Tien L.
63782
Norrie C.
36661

Learner Tien defeated Cameron Norrie 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Metz final on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #17, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Learner Tien extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Learner Tien closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-01Shanghai MastersR32hardLearner Tien7-6(4) 6-3
2025-02-24AcapulcoR32hardLearner Tien7-6(5) 6-3
2024-12-30Hong KongR32hardCameron Norrie6-3 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Norrie C.
32
Serve
45
67
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
90
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Even
83
83
Deciding sets·Even
100
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
100
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Norrie C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+115 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1789
5.3Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1829
7.2
H2H
2.8
6.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
3.4
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Norrie C.
Freshness·Slight edge
83
90

Tien L.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Norrie C.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Norrie C.[7]
6-33-67-66
Semi-finals
Tien L.
Sachko V.
6-16-4
Norrie C.[7]
Sonego L.
4-66-26-4
Quarter-finals
Norrie C.[7]
Jacquet K.
4-67-626-4
Tien L.
Berrettini M.
5-76-26-3
Sachko V.
Tabur C.
6-43-66-4
Sonego L.
Altmaier D.
6-47-66
R16
Tabur C.
Blockx A.
6-747-667-66
Altmaier D.
Gaston H.
4-66-00-0
Tien L.
Echargui M.
7-636-3
Norrie C.[7]
Cazaux A.
6-717-676-2
Berrettini M.
Vukic A.
7-656-3
Sachko V.
Bublik A.[3]
7-53-67-5
Sonego L.
Cobolli F.[4]
2-66-37-5
Jacquet K.
Added D.
6-06-2
R32
Vukic A.
Moutet C.[8]
3-67-667-68
Tien L.
Blanchet U.
6-36-3
Jacquet K.
Van Assche L.
4-66-36-4
Sonego L.
Choinski J.
4-66-46-4
Norrie C.[7]
Royer V.
6-36-726-3
Altmaier D.
Rinderknech A.[6]
6-46-4
Cazaux A.
Mannarino A.
6-37-64
Tabur C.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-2
Blockx A.
Passaro F.
3-66-36-4
Sachko V.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-6106-3
Gaston H.
Atmane T.
6-46-1
Berrettini M.
Halys Q.
6-26-4