Ann Li vs Camila Osorio — Guangzhou Round of 16

Guangzhou · WTA · Round of 16
Ann Li
USA2
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 October 2025
hard
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#68WTA
1807ELO
1780Hard ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Li A.
7-5 6-2
Osorio C.
Li A.
762
Osorio C.
520

Ann Li defeated Camila Osorio 7-5 6-2 in the Guangzhou round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #29. Ann Li extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Ann Li closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenR128hardAnn Li6-4 6-7(5) 7-5
2025-09-24BeijingR128hardCamila Osorio7-5 6-7(5) 7-5
2022-08-29US OpenR128hardCamila Osorio1-6 6-3 6-1
2021-10-18TenerifeFhardAnn Li6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Osorio C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Li A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Osorio C.
47
Serve
10
49
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Osorio C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Osorio C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
84
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
73
Break points won·Clear edge
87
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Osorio C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1746
Surface ELO
5.5+35 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1807
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.6
Surface form
4.9
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Osorio C.
Freshness·Even
97
94

Li A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Osorio C.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Li A.[2]
Sun L.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Li A.[2]
Zhang S.
5-2
Sun L.
Liu C.
6-07-63
Quarter-finals
Sun L.
Mcnally C.
3-66-36-4
Zhang S.
Volynets K.
7-655-77-5
Liu C.
Seidel E.
4-66-06-4
Li A.[2]
Cocciaretto E.
6-36-4
R16
Volynets K.
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
6-36-3
Zhang S.
Erjavec V.
3-66-36-2
Mcnally C.
Tomljanovic A.
6-44-66-3
Sun L.
Wang Y.
6-36-1
Liu C.
Bondar A.
6-36-4
Seidel E.
Putintseva Y.[6]
6-36-2
Cocciaretto E.
Wang X.
6-32-66-3
Li A.[2]
Osorio C.
7-56-2
R32
Sun L.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[1]
7-637-62
Wang Y.
Rakhimova K.
6-26-4
Bondar A.
Guo H.
6-33-67-64
Volynets K.
Kawa K.
4-66-26-2
Zhang S.
Zakharova A.
6-46-1
Erjavec V.
Maria T.[3]
6-46-776-2
Li A.[2]
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-47-64
Seidel E.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Parry D.
6-46-776-2
Liu C.
Eala A.[4]
2-66-46-4
Osorio C.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-2
Mcnally C.
Juvan K.
6-31-66-3
Tomljanovic A.
Parks A.[5]
7-57-5
Putintseva Y.[6]
Korneeva A.
7-624-66-4
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Kudermetova P.[8]
1-66-16-2
Wang X.
Jones F.[7]
6-46-4