Ann Li vs Camila Osorio — Tenerife Final

Tenerife · WTA · Final
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
hard
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#68WTA
1807ELO
1780Hard ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Li A.
6-1 6-4
Osorio C.
Li A.
662
Osorio C.
140

Ann Li defeated Camila Osorio 6-1 6-4 in the Tenerife final on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #29. Ann Li extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenR128hardAnn Li6-4 6-7(5) 7-5
2025-10-20GuangzhouR16hardAnn Li7-5 6-2
2025-09-24BeijingR128hardCamila Osorio7-5 6-7(5) 7-5
2022-08-29US OpenR128hardCamila Osorio1-6 6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Osorio C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Li A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Osorio C.
47
Serve
10
49
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Osorio C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
47%
Break points saved·Even
55%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Osorio C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
84
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
73
Break points won·Clear edge
87
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Osorio C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1746
Surface ELO
5.5+35 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1807
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
2.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Osorio C.
Freshness·Even
96
93

Li A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Osorio C.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Li A.
Osorio C.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Osorio C.
Giorgi C.[4]
6-47-5
Li A.
Cornet A.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Zheng S.
7-56-1
Giorgi C.[4]
Rus A.
6-16-1
Li A.
Begu I.
7-57-5
Cornet A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-3
R16
Cornet A.
Wang X.
6-16-754-1
Rus A.
Minnen G.
6-16-2
Schmiedlova A.
Cristian J.
6-27-5
Li A.
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Osorio C.
Sherif M.
6-46-2
Zheng S.
Tauson C.[7]
7-642-66-4
Giorgi C.[4]
Kovinic D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Vekic D.
4-66-27-64
R32
Osorio C.
Svitolina E.[1]
5-76-36-2
Minnen G.
Minella M.
7-57-62
Zheng S.
Masarova R.
6-46-2
Tauson C.[7]
Watson H.
6-42-67-66
Cristian J.
Zidansek T.[2]
7-54-66-1
Sherif M.
Stefanini L.
6-26-0
Begu I.
Kostyuk M.
6-46-4
Cornet A.
Voegele S.
6-16-2
Li A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
2-66-46-1
Wang X.
Zhang S.[6]
6-26-1
Giorgi C.[4]
Bolsova A.
7-643-66-4
Kovinic D.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-3
Rus A.
Golubic V.[5]
6-36-4
Vekic D.
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
6-16-4
Gracheva V.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-45-77-64
Schmiedlova A.
Juvan K.
4-66-16-4