Naomi Osaka vs Suzan Lamens — Osaka Round of 16

Osaka · WTA · Round of 16
Naomi Osaka
JPN1
Naomi Osaka
#14WTA
1987ELO
1922Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
Suzan Lamens
NED
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
Osaka N.
7-6 3-6 6-2
Lamens S.
Osaka N.
78362
Lamens S.
66621

Naomi Osaka defeated Suzan Lamens 7-6 3-6 6-2 in the Osaka round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Naomi Osaka came in ranked #14, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Naomi Osaka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Naomi Osaka closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-06-10s HertogenboschR16grassNaomi Osaka6-2 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Osaka N.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Lamens S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Osaka N.Lamens S.
70
Serve
0
60
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Osaka N.Lamens S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
51%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osaka N.Lamens S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
43
Break points saved·Dominant
96
51
Break points won·Even
97
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osaka N.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Lamens S.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.2+349 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.8Hard Elo 1573
9.2Overall Elo 1987
ELO gap
0.8Overall Elo 1622
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Osaka N.Lamens S.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
100

Osaka N.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 44 games (7d) · Lamens S.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Fernandez L.[4]
Valentova T.
6-05-76-3
Semi-finals
Fernandez L.[4]
Cirstea S.
6-12-66-4
Valentova T.
Cristian J.
6-736-46-3
Quarter-finals
Cristian J.
Osaka N.[1]
W/O
Fernandez L.[4]
Sramkova R.
7-626-3
Valentova T.
Danilovic O.[6]
4-66-26-3
Cirstea S.
Golubic V.
6-22-66-2
R16
Osaka N.[1]
Lamens S.
7-663-66-2
Cristian J.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[8]
0-66-46-2
Sramkova R.
Li A.[7]
6-23-66-3
Cirstea S.
Boulter K.
6-36-1
Golubic V.
Bouzkova M.[5]
1-66-27-63
Valentova T.
Mertens E.[3]
6-46-1
Danilovic O.[6]
Krueger A.
6-46-4
Fernandez L.[4]
Galfi D.
6-16-4
R32
Cristian J.
Cocciaretto E.
6-27-64
Valentova T.
Eala A.
6-16-2
Danilovic O.[6]
Hibino N.
6-41-66-2
Boulter K.
Noskova L.[2]
7-636-3
Bouzas Maneiro J.[8]
Volynets K.
6-26-4
Mertens E.[3]
Bucsa C.
7-656-3
Golubic V.
Andreescu B.
6-34-66-4
Fernandez L.[4]
Baptiste H.
6-27-5
Sramkova R.
Garland J.
6-36-1
Galfi D.
Parks A.
6-46-4
Bouzkova M.[5]
Shibahara E.
6-16-1
Cirstea S.
Uchijima M.
2-66-46-2
Li A.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-46-0
Krueger A.
Sakkari M.
2-66-36-4
Osaka N.[1]
Sonobe W.
6-06-4
Lamens S.
Arango E.
6-16-2