Naomi Osaka vs Suzan Lamens — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
Naomi Osaka
JPN
Naomi Osaka
#14WTA
1987ELO
1793Grass ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Suzan Lamens
NEDWC
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1524Grass ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
Osaka N.
6-2 6-2
Lamens S.
Osaka N.
662
Lamens S.
220

Naomi Osaka defeated Suzan Lamens 6-2 6-2 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Naomi Osaka came in ranked #14, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Naomi Osaka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-13OsakaR16hardNaomi Osaka7-6(6) 3-6 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Osaka N.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Lamens S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Osaka N.Lamens S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.9
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osaka N.Lamens S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
43
Break points saved·Dominant
96
51
Break points won·Even
97
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osaka N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Lamens S.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.8+269 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Grass Elo 1524
9.2Overall Elo 1987
ELO gap
0.8Overall Elo 1622
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Osaka N.Lamens S.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
100

Osaka N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 44 games (7d) · Lamens S.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Samsonova L.[2]
Andreescu B.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Andreescu B.
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Alexandrova E.[1]
6-36-716-1
Quarter-finals
Galfi D.
Krunic A.
7-56-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Montgomery R.
6-46-3
Samsonova L.[2]
Minnen G.
6-47-5
Andreescu B.
Osaka N.
6-43-67-63
R16
Samsonova L.[2]
Naef C.
7-56-2
Galfi D.
Kudermetova V.[5]
6-33-67-5
Andreescu B.
Yuan Y.[4]
6-46-4
Osaka N.
Lamens S.
6-26-2
Krunic A.
Pegula J.[1]
7-636-736-4
Montgomery R.
Niemeier J.
6-36-3
Minnen G.
Vekic D.[7]
6-10-67-5
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bektas E.
7-56-4
R32
Osaka N.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-4
Vekic D.[7]
Korpatsch T.
6-16-3
Minnen G.
Masarova R.
6-26-4
Samsonova L.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-16-3
Andreescu B.
Vedder E.
4-66-36-2
Kudermetova V.[5]
Bai Z.
7-56-1
Montgomery R.
Linette M.[8]
6-746-37-5
Krunic A.
Ponchet J.
4-66-26-1
Naef C.
Mandlik E.
7-641-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Rus A.
6-06-3
Bektas E.
Blinkova A.
6-46-0
Lamens S.
Pera B.
4-66-26-4
Yuan Y.[4]
Shnaider D.
1-66-46-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Rodionova A.
6-36-4
Niemeier J.
Tauson C.[2]
6-46-736-4