Jannik Sinner vs Learner Tien — Beijing Final

Beijing · ATP · Final
Jannik Sinner
ITA1
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2263Hard ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 25 September 2025
hard
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#17ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Sinner J.
6-2 6-2
Tien L.
Sinner J.
662
Tien L.
220

Jannik Sinner defeated Learner Tien 6-2 6-2 in the Beijing final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Jannik Sinner extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersQFhardJannik Sinner6-1 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Sinner J.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sinner J.Tien L.
100
Serve
32
100
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sinner J.Tien L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
59%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
73%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sinner J.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
100
90
Break points saved·Even
100
97
Break points won·Clear edge
100
83
Deciding sets·Even
100
100
Tiebreaks·Even
100
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sinner J.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Tien L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.8+359 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Hard Elo 1904
10.0Overall Elo 2320
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1941
5.0
H2H
5.0
9.0
Surface form
6.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sinner J.Tien L.
Freshness·Dominant
55
83

Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 94 games (7d) · Tien L.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
26°COvercast
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tien L.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Tien L.
Medvedev D.[8]
5-77-54-0
Sinner J.[1]
De Minaur A.[3]
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Tien L.
Musetti L.[4]
4-66-33-0
De Minaur A.[3]
Mensik J.[7]
4-1
Medvedev D.[8]
Zverev A.[2]
6-36-3
Sinner J.[1]
Marozsan F.
6-17-5
R16
De Minaur A.[3]
Rinderknech A.
6-33-67-62
Tien L.
Cobolli F.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.
Muller A.
6-37-65
Medvedev D.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-36-3
Mensik J.[7]
Cazaux A.
6-32-66-4
Musetti L.[4]
Mannarino A.
6-36-3
Zverev A.[2]
Moutet C.
7-53-66-3
Sinner J.[1]
Atmane T.
6-45-76-0
R32
Sinner J.[1]
Cilic M.
6-26-2
Tien L.
Cerundolo F.
4-66-36-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sonego L.
6-46-3
Moutet C.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-5
De Minaur A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-0
Muller A.
Khachanov K.[5]
4-67-656-4
Rinderknech A.
Goffin D.
6-43-66-4
Cobolli F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-636-3
Atmane T.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Bonzi B.
7-616-3
Cazaux A.
Shang J.
0-67-657-5
Musetti L.[4]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-636-746-4
Medvedev D.[8]
Norrie C.
6-36-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-3
Mannarino A.
Bublik A.
6-36-2
Mensik J.[7]
Kecmanovic M.
7-56-4