Juncheng Shang vs Zizou Bergs — Chengdu Round of 32

Chengdu · ATP · Round of 32
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 17 September 2025
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Shang J.
6-1 5-7 6-4
Bergs Z.
Shang J.
6562
Bergs Z.
1741

Juncheng Shang defeated Zizou Bergs 6-1 5-7 6-4 in the Chengdu round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #37. Juncheng Shang extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Juncheng Shang came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-28Paris MastersQ2hardJuncheng Shang6-4 3-6 7-6(2)
2024-05-06Rome MastersQ2clayZizou Bergs6-4 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Bergs Z.
34
Serve
25
18
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (16 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
69
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Clear edge
45
21
Deciding sets·Even
94
92
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 41 days (−0.7)
Bergs Z.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1698
Surface ELO
5.7+58 Hard Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1808
10.0
H2H
0.0
2.9
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shang J.Bergs Z.
Freshness·
—
64

Bergs Z.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.
Musetti L.[1]
6-32-67-65
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.
Nakashima B.[4]
6-47-60
Musetti L.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Musetti L.[1]
Basilashvili N.
6-36-3
Shevchenko A.
Daniel T.
7-623-66-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Giron M.
6-32-67-63
Tabilo A.
Oconnell C.
4-67-56-2
R16
Daniel T.
Griekspoor T.[3]
3-66-46-3
Tabilo A.
Darderi L.[2]
6-46-3
Giron M.
Sonego L.[8]
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[4]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.
Zhou Y.
6-26-4
Musetti L.[1]
Prizmic D.
7-53-66-2
Shevchenko A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
6-727-656-4
Basilashvili N.
Mcdonald M.
6-27-64
R32
Tabilo A.
Thompson J.
6-46-3
Shevchenko A.
Monfils G.
6-736-31-0
Giron M.
Quinn E.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.
Halys Q.
6-736-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Misolic F.
3-66-16-4
Sonego L.[8]
Cerundolo J.
4-66-36-1
Basilashvili N.
Harris B.
7-656-3
Shang J.
Bergs Z.
6-15-76-4
Zhou Y.
Norrie C.[5]
6-736-47-62
Prizmic D.
Atmane T.
6-46-3
Daniel T.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Mcdonald M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-43-66-3