Zizou Bergs vs Juncheng Shang — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 2

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Zizou Bergs
BEL11
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
CHN18
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1640Clay ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Bergs Z.
6-4 7-6
Shang J.
Bergs Z.
6772
Shang J.
4650

Zizou Bergs defeated Juncheng Shang 6-4 7-6 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #37. Zizou Bergs claimed a first win over Juncheng Shang in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-17ChengduR32hardJuncheng Shang6-1 5-7 6-4
2024-10-28Paris MastersQ2hardJuncheng Shang6-4 3-6 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Shang J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
69
76
Break points saved·Even
95
96
Break points won·Clear edge
21
45
Deciding sets·Even
92
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Shang J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+56 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Clay Elo 1640
5.7Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1746
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Shang J.
Freshness·
70
—

Bergs Z.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 56%
Q2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Kopriva V.
6-43-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Wolf J.[10]
6-16-4
Muller A.[17]
Albot R.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[23]
Moutet C.[4]
6-36-4
Passaro F.
Ajdukovic D.[24]
7-656-767-63
Bergs Z.[11]
Shang J.[18]
6-47-65
Schwartzman D.
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Bagnis F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[9]
Gasquet R.[21]
6-36-4
Barrere G.[16]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-37-67
Atmane T.
Mayot H.[19]
6-32-66-2
Nakashima B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-44-66-4
Q1
Muller A.[17]
Nava E.
4-66-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Gaston H.[7]
6-33-66-1
De Jong J.
Rodionov J.[22]
6-32-66-4
Shang J.[18]
Maestrelli F.
6-13-66-3
Albot R.
Daniel T.[3]
6-40-66-1
Moutet C.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
Marterer M.[9]
Picchione A.
4-66-37-5
Gasquet R.[21]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Ramos A.[13]
6-13-67-5
Wolf J.[10]
Zapata Miralles B.
4-67-656-1
Medjedovic H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[15]
7-616-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Nakashima B.[1]
Fatic N.
7-657-5
Bergs Z.[11]
Kypson P.
4-66-36-4
Mayot H.[19]
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.[23]
Oradini G.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Coria F.[2]
6-35-77-63
Kukushkin M.
Garin C.[5]
5-77-697-62
Ajdukovic D.[24]
Piros Z.
7-623-66-2
Barrere G.[16]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-5
Moreno De Alboran N.
Varillas J.[14]
6-47-5
Atmane T.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
7-57-65
Passaro F.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-57-5
Bagnis F.
Tirante T.[12]
7-687-65