Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Matteo Arnaldi — Winston-Salem Round of 32

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Matteo Arnaldi
ITA6
Matteo Arnaldi
#35ATP
1830ELO
1732Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 6-3
Arnaldi M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Arnaldi M.
330

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 6-3 in the Winston-Salem round of 32 on hard. Botic Van De Zandschulp extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonR128grassBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-4
2023-11-23Davis Cup Finals QF: ITA vs NEDRRhardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Arnaldi M.

Arnaldi M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Arnaldi M.
41
Serve
23
43
Return
22

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Arnaldi M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Arnaldi M.
Clutch Rating·Even
77
78
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Clear edge
68
51
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Arnaldi M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5Hard Elo 1711
Surface ELO
4.5+22 Hard Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1830
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Arnaldi M.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
95

Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Arnaldi M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3