Jesper De Jong vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Bastad Semi-final

Bastad · ATP · Semi-final
NED
Jesper De Jong
#106ATP
1651ELO
1647Clay ELO
$261kYTD
$2.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
[5]
#59ATP
1744ELO
1732Clay ELO
$502kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWWLWLWL

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Ugo Carabelli C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.6Clay Elo 1647
Surface ELO
6.4+85 Clay Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1651
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1744
2.8
H2H
7.2
5.2
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

De Jong J.
6772
Ugo Carabelli C.
3630

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
0.75
SlowFast

Head to head

3–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-07Villa Maria CHFclayCamilo Ugo Carabelli7-6(3) 3-6 6-4
2024-01-15Australian OpenQ3hardJesper De Jong7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7)
2023-01-16Piracicaba CHR16clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli7-6(0) 6-1
2023-01-09Tigre 2 CHR16clayJesper De Jong6-4 6-1
2021-05-24Oeiras 4 CHR32clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli6-4 6-2
2020-11-16Guayaquil CHQ2clayJesper De Jong6-1 6-3

Statistics

Recent form
De Jong J.Ugo Carabelli C.
58%1st serve in+2%60%
70%1st serve points won70%
47%2nd serve points won+2%49%
60%Service points won+2%62%
39%Return points won+3%36%
55%Break points saved+9%64%
6.4Aces / match+3.33.1
4.1Double faults / match+1.82.3

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Darderi L.[6]
De Jong J.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Darderi L.[6]
Cerundolo F.[1]
6-23-67-63
De Jong J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Darderi L.[6]
Baez S.[4]
6-06-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Griekspoor T.[2]
4-67-636-3
Cerundolo F.[1]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-03-66-3
R16
Baez S.[4]
Budkov Kjaer N.
3-66-27-5
Misolic F.
Borges N.[3]
3-67-616-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gaston H.
4-66-26-2
Griekspoor T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-666-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-635-76-3
Cerundolo F.[1]
Navone M.
6-36-3
Darderi L.[6]
Ymer E.
6-26-2
De Jong J.
Kopriva V.[8]
7-637-5
R32
Ymer E.
Boyer T.
6-33-66-2
Kopriva V.[8]
Dellien H.
6-13-0
Gaston H.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Budkov Kjaer N.
Monteiro T.
5-76-37-62
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.
7-57-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-4
Darderi L.[6]
Collignon R.
6-22-66-2
Misolic F.
Moller E.
6-33-67-5
Pellegrino A.
Faria J.
2-66-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ymer M.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Rejchtman Vinciguerra W.
6-36-2