Zachary Svajda vs Marin Cilic — Ilkley CH Round of 16

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1657Grass ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Marin Cilic
CRO4
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1756Grass ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Svajda Z.
6-3 6-4
Cilic M.
Svajda Z.
662
Cilic M.
340

Zachary Svajda defeated Marin Cilic 6-3 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, defending last year's semi-final. Zachary Svajda extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardZachary Svajda7-6(5) 6-4
2024-09-18HangzhouR32hardMarin Cilic5-7 6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Cilic M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Cilic M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
70%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
9.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Cilic M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
69
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
99
Break points won·Dominant
66
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Cilic M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.0Grass Elo 1657
Surface ELO
6.0+99 Grass Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1800
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
7.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Cilic M.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Cilic M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[7]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.
Mochizuki S.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Svajda Z.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
3-66-37-64
Pinnington Jones J.
Landaluce M.[8]
7-56-2
Svajda Z.
Riedi L.
7-684-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
R16
Riedi L.
Cassone M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.
Cilic M.[4]
6-36-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Harris L.
6-36-0
Shimabukuro S.
Trotter J.
6-34-66-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Harris B.[3]
7-644-66-3
Schoolkate T.[7]
Searle H.
2-66-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Monday J.
6-46-756-3
Crawford O.
Brooksby J.
6-47-5
R32
Trotter J.
Rodesch C.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Mayot H.
3-67-57-5
Riedi L.
Clarke J.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-4
Searle H.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Cilic M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-37-66
Cassone M.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Crawford O.
Holt B.[2]
6-36-727-65
Harris B.[3]
Gojo B.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Watanuki Y.
7-656-3
Monday J.
Atmane T.[6]
7-646-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Kukushkin M.
6-27-5
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-43-66-2
Harris L.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Bolt A.
6-757-657-5
Landaluce M.[8]
Habib H.
6-46-736-3