Brandon Nakashima vs Raphael Collignon — Hamburg Round of 32

Hamburg · ATP · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA7
Brandon Nakashima
#31ATP
1839ELO
1735Clay ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Sunday, 18 May 2025
clay
Raphael Collignon
BEL
Raphael Collignon
#43ATP
1894ELO
1813Clay ELO
$633kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Nakashima B.
6-5
Collignon R.
Nakashima B.
6–
Collignon R.
5–

Brandon Nakashima advanced when Raphael Collignon retired 6-5 in the Hamburg round of 32. Brandon Nakashima extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-04BrisbaneQFhardBrandon Nakashima6-3 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Collignon R.

Collignon R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Collignon R.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Collignon R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
90
Break points won·Dominant
13
55
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
80
Tiebreaks·Even
89
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Collignon R.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1735
Surface ELO
6.0+78 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1894
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Collignon R.
Freshness·Clear edge
84
97

Nakashima B.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Collignon R.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CDrizzle
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Cobolli F.
Rublev A.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.
Etcheverry T.
2-67-56-4
Rublev A.[3]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[3]
Darderi L.
6-13-66-3
Etcheverry T.
Lehecka J.
7-56-3
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Muller A.
7-646-766-3
Cobolli F.
Bautista Agut R.
7-646-0
R16
Etcheverry T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Zverev A.[1]
6-34-67-65
Darderi L.
Nakashima B.[7]
7-56-776-2
Cobolli F.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
6-47-5
Rublev A.[3]
Engel J.
6-37-5
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-26-4
Lehecka J.
Cerundolo F.[4]
7-56-2
Bautista Agut R.
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Engel J.
Struff J.
7-647-64
Zverev A.[1]
Kovacevic A.
6-17-65
Nakashima B.[7]
Collignon R.
6-5
Darderi L.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-16-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
7-56-2
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Sachko V.
5-76-26-2
Cerundolo F.[4]
Martinez P.
6-26-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Bublik A.
7-666-4
Etcheverry T.
Comesana F.
7-646-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Baez S.[8]
6-32-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Monfils G.
6-36-3
Muller A.
Ymer E.
6-37-5
Lehecka J.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-2
Rublev A.[3]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-3
Bautista Agut R.
Giron M.
7-656-0