Brandon Holt vs Constant Lestienne — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA3
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Holt B.
1-6 7-6 6-4
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
17762
Lestienne C.
66241

Brandon Holt defeated Constant Lestienne 1-6 7-6 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. Brandon Holt claimed a first win over Constant Lestienne in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-19San DiegoR32hardConstant Lestienne5-7 7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
41
Break points saved·Even
85
86
Break points won·Slight edge
31
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
26
Tiebreaks·Even
69
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lestienne C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4