Constant Lestienne vs Brandon Holt — San Diego Round of 32

San Diego · ATP · Round of 32
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Lestienne C.
5-7 7-6 6-3
Holt B.
Lestienne C.
57762
Holt B.
76531

Constant Lestienne defeated Brandon Holt 5-7 7-6 6-3 in the San Diego round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lestienne C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lestienne C.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lestienne C.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
58
Break points saved·Even
86
85
Break points won·Slight edge
39
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
79
Tiebreaks·Even
70
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lestienne C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
6.3
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[5]
Giron M.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giron M.[3]
Evans D.[1]
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Evans D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Galan D.
6-34-66-4
Oconnell C.
Brooksby J.[2]
6-44-67-5
Giron M.[3]
Duckworth J.[7]
7-656-3
R16
Evans D.[1]
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[5]
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Galan D.
Martinez P.[4]
5-76-16-4
Brooksby J.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-2
Lestienne C.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-16-3
Giron M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Krueger M.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Wolf J.[8]
6-37-5
R32
Oconnell C.
Kubler J.
4-66-30-0
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
5-77-656-3
Etcheverry T.
Mena F.
7-666-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-54-66-1
Kudla D.
Verdasco F.
6-36-3
Galan D.
Huesler M.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Svajda Z.
7-57-65
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-27-66
Tabilo A.[6]
Johnson S.
7-56-2