Greet Minnen vs Suzan Lamens — Austin Round of 16

Austin · WTA · Round of 16
Greet Minnen
BEL
Greet Minnen
#205WTA
1723ELO
1667Hard ELO
28 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Suzan Lamens
NED8
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
Minnen G.
6-1 6-0
Lamens S.
Minnen G.
662
Lamens S.
100

Greet Minnen defeated Suzan Lamens 6-1 6-0 in the Austin round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Suzan Lamens came in ranked #129.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Minnen G.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Lamens S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Minnen G.

Serve advantage — Minnen G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Minnen G.Lamens S.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Minnen G.Lamens S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Minnen G.Lamens S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
43
Break points saved·Dominant
80
51
Break points won·Slight edge
90
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
31
Tiebreaks·Even
81
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Minnen G.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Lamens S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+94 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1573
6.0Overall Elo 1723
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1622
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Minnen G.Lamens S.
Freshness·Dominant
65
100

Minnen G.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 86 games (7d) · Lamens S.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[1]
Kessler M.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Tomljanovic A.
6-14-66-3
Kessler M.[5]
Minnen G.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-26-2
Tomljanovic A.
Shibahara E.
7-53-67-68
Minnen G.
Dolehide C.
6-37-5
Kessler M.[5]
Cirstea S.
5-76-46-1
R16
Tomljanovic A.
Burrage J.
4-66-36-0
Minnen G.
Lamens S.[8]
6-16-0
Cirstea S.
Shnaider D.[2]
6-32-66-4
Dolehide C.
Gracheva V.
5-76-26-2
Shibahara E.
Birrell K.
6-34-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-16-3
Kessler M.[5]
Bucsa C.
5-76-37-64
Blinkova A.
Maria T.
6-26-2
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Rus A.
6-33-2
Gracheva V.
Stearns P.[3]
6-26-3
Shnaider D.[2]
Prozorova T.
0-66-27-5
Birrell K.
Yuan Y.[4]
7-657-65
Cirstea S.
Siegemund L.
6-30-66-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Rapolu M.
6-26-4
Dolehide C.
Zakharova A.
6-25-76-4
Maria T.
Bondar A.
6-44-66-1
Shibahara E.
Juvan K.
2-66-36-2
Tomljanovic A.
Volynets K.[7]
7-637-5
Minnen G.
Wei S.
5-76-36-2
Burrage J.
Kvitova P.
3-66-46-4
Blinkova A.
Uchijima M.[6]
4-66-46-0
Lamens S.[8]
Rakhimova K.
1-66-36-4
Bucsa C.
Pera B.
6-36-4
Kessler M.[5]
Golubic V.
6-27-5