Sebastian Baez vs Emilio Nava — Rosario CH Round of 32

Rosario CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG1
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
clay
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Baez S.
6-3 6-3
Nava E.
Baez S.
662
Nava E.
330

Sebastian Baez defeated Emilio Nava 6-3 6-3 in the Rosario CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sebastian Baez extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-12AucklandR32hardSebastian Baez4-6 7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Nava E.
7
Serve
22
43
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.7
7.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
52
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Dominant
86
17
Deciding sets·Even
88
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+32 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1686
5.6Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1704
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 10
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
4.0
2.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Nava E.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Dellien H.
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Dellien H.
Baez S.[1]
6-36-7136-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Baez S.[1]
Passaro F.[5]
6-16-2
Dellien H.
Comesana F.[3]
7-673-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Ficovich J.
3-66-16-0
Dellien Velasco M.
Cerundolo J.
7-664-67-5
R16
Passaro F.[5]
Collarini A.
7-646-3
Comesana F.[3]
Pellegrino A.
7-57-5
Dellien H.
Nagal S.[8]
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Justo G.
7-52-67-5
Baez S.[1]
Heide G.
7-617-65
Cerundolo J.
Coria F.[7]
7-52-66-3
Ficovich J.
Dzumhur D.[4]
6-27-64
Dellien Velasco M.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-67-626-3
R32
Dellien H.
Tseng C.
4-66-44-1
Comesana F.[3]
Torres J.
2-66-46-3
Nagal S.[8]
Olivo R.
5-76-16-0
Heide G.
Mena F.
6-23-1
Collarini A.
Popko D.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Schwartzman D.
4-66-36-4
Justo G.
Tirante T.
3-66-16-2
Dzumhur D.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-4
Coria F.[7]
Schwaerzler J.
4-66-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Alves M.
7-53-66-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Muller A.[2]
6-46-4
Passaro F.[5]
Galan D.
2-66-36-3
Pellegrino A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-4
Cerundolo J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-47-5
Baez S.[1]
Nava E.
6-36-3