Sebastian Baez vs Emilio Nava — Auckland Round of 32

Auckland · ATP · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG7
Sebastian Baez
#57ATP
1759ELO
1709Hard ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Baez S.
4-6 7-5 6-3
Nava E.
Baez S.
4762
Nava E.
6531

Sebastian Baez defeated Emilio Nava 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the Auckland round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #57, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Serve advantage — Baez S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Baez S.Nava E.
5
Serve
39
63
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
68%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
52
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Dominant
86
17
Deciding sets·Even
88
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+88 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1621
5.6Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
6.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Nava E.
Freshness·Even
94
95

Baez S.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Nava E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CDrizzle
Wind 25 km/hHumidity 64%
Final
Mensik J.[3]
Baez S.[7]
6-37-67
Semi-finals
Baez S.[7]
Giron M.
6-16-4
Mensik J.[3]
Marozsan F.
7-694-66-1
Quarter-finals
Mensik J.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-46-2
Baez S.[7]
Shelton B.[1]
7-56-3
Giron M.
Darderi L.[4]
1-67-56-4
Marozsan F.
Spizzirri E.
6-42-66-2
R16
Darderi L.[4]
Tabilo A.
1-67-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Norrie C.[5]
4-66-37-64
Baez S.[7]
Brooksby J.
7-56-0
Marozsan F.
Ruud C.[2]
6-46-4
Shelton B.[1]
Comesana F.
7-56-4
Spizzirri E.
Borges N.[8]
7-666-4
Mensik J.[3]
Medjedovic H.
6-13-66-3
Giron M.
Michelsen A.[6]
6-46-4
R32
Marozsan F.
Monfils G.
5-76-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Bautista Agut R.
6-37-62
Brooksby J.
Watt J.
6-46-3
Giron M.
Muller A.
6-26-2
Baez S.[7]
Nava E.
4-67-56-3
Medjedovic H.
Kovacevic A.
6-43-67-62
Spizzirri E.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Norrie C.[5]
Gaston H.
6-36-4
Tabilo A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Comesana F.
Royer V.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[6]
Navone M.
2-66-27-5
Borges N.[8]
Etcheverry T.
7-53-67-62