Nicolas Jarry vs Lorenzo Sonego — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#211ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Lorenzo Sonego
ITA
Lorenzo Sonego
#69ATP
1719ELO
1702Hard ELO
$435kYTD
$9.8MCAREER
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Jarry N.
7-6 6-3
Sonego L.
Jarry N.
7762
Sonego L.
6430

Nicolas Jarry defeated Lorenzo Sonego 7-6 6-3 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lorenzo Sonego came in ranked #69, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Nicolas Jarry narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Jarry closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-02Shanghai MastersR32hardNicolas Jarry7-6(4) 6-2
2023-09-15Davis Cup Finals RR: ITA vs CHIRRhardLorenzo Sonego3-6 7-5 6-4
2019-02-11Buenos AiresR32clayLorenzo Sonego6-7(3) 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Sonego L.

Sonego L.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jarry N.Sonego L.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
38

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Sonego L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
34%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Sonego L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
69
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Dominant
4
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
71
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jarry N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sonego L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Hard Elo 1574
Surface ELO
6.8+128 Hard Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1648
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1719
5.4
H2H
4.6
2.9
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.1
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.3
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jarry N.Sonego L.
Freshness·
—
72

Sonego L.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 42 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
14°COvercast
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Zverev A.[3]
Humbert U.[15]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[15]
Khachanov K.
6-766-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Rune H.[13]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Rune H.[13]
De Minaur A.[9]
6-44-67-5
Khachanov K.
Dimitrov G.[8]
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
7-56-4
Humbert U.[15]
Thompson J.
6-27-64
R16
Humbert U.[15]
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-13-67-5
Rune H.[13]
Cazaux A.
3-66-36-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Draper J.
5-76-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Fils A.
6-43-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Cerundolo F.
6-716-46-2
Dimitrov G.[8]
Rinderknech A.
6-24-67-65
Khachanov K.
Popyrin A.
7-656-4
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.
7-57-65
R32
Fils A.
Struff J.
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Tabilo A.
6-36-4
Thompson J.
Ruud C.[7]
7-633-66-4
Rinderknech A.
Michelsen A.
7-667-67
Draper J.
Fritz T.[5]
7-664-66-4
Zverev A.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-626-3
Cerundolo F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-667-65
Dimitrov G.[8]
Etcheverry T.
6-796-37-5
Khachanov K.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-7126-16-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-65
Mannarino A.
Bergs Z.
3-66-26-4
Humbert U.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Alcaraz C.[2]
Jarry N.
7-56-1
Popyrin A.
Medvedev D.[4]
6-42-67-64
Cazaux A.
Shelton B.
6-37-64
Rune H.[13]
Bublik A.
6-46-2
R64
De Minaur A.[9]
Navone M.
7-56-1
Struff J.
Musetti L.[16]
6-46-2
Etcheverry T.
Zhang Z.
6-37-66
Khachanov K.
Oconnell C.
6-43-67-66
Giron M.
Shang J.
7-667-66
Rinderknech A.
Machac T.
6-735-3
Michelsen A.
Hurkacz H.[12]
6-16-3
Tabilo A.
Borges N.
3-67-656-3
Draper J.
Lehecka J.
7-56-2
Fils A.
Cilic M.
7-656-4
Kecmanovic M.
Baez S.
6-46-767-5
Griekspoor T.
Darderi L.
6-36-4
Bublik A.
Fognini F.
7-57-5
Rune H.[13]
Arnaldi M.
6-46-4
Thompson J.
Martinez P.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Paul T.[11]
6-37-5
Humbert U.[15]
Nakashima B.
6-34-66-4
Jarry N.
Sonego L.
7-646-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-757-646-3
Cerundolo F.
Halys Q.
7-656-3
Shelton B.
Moutet C.
6-36-786-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Carballes Baena R.
4-66-36-3
Popyrin A.
Berrettini M.
7-57-62