Taro Daniel vs Coleman Wong — Taipei 2 CH Quarter-final

Taipei 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taro Daniel
JPN2
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2024
hard
HKG5
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Daniel T.
6-4 6-4
Wong C.
Daniel T.
662
Wong C.
440

Taro Daniel defeated Coleman Wong 6-4 6-4 in the Taipei 2 CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-17ChengduR32hardTaro Daniel6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Wong C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Daniel T.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
8.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (132 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Even
42
43
Break points saved·Even
93
91
Break points won·Dominant
37
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Wong C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1512
Surface ELO
7.1+81 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1567
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1602
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.8
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
9.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Wong C.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d) · Wong C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[2]
Walton A.[3]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Walton A.[3]
Vukic A.[1]
6-35-76-3
Daniel T.[2]
Tseng C.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.[1]
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Walton A.[3]
Mcdonald M.[6]
6-17-60
Tseng C.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[2]
Wong C.[5]
6-46-4
R16
Vukic A.[1]
Janvier M.
6-43-67-66
Mukund S.
Uchiyama Y.[7]
5-76-37-64
Walton A.[3]
Huang T.
7-56-1
Mcdonald M.[6]
Isomura K.
6-26-0
Hsu Y.
Oliveira G.
6-747-666-4
Tseng C.[4]
Uchida K.
5-77-57-5
Wong C.[5]
Lee K.
6-16-736-3
Daniel T.[2]
Paire B.
6-26-4
R32
Hsu Y.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-4
Isomura K.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-65
Vukic A.[1]
Takahashi Y.
6-17-63
Janvier M.
Ho R.
6-16-2
Mukund S.
Chanta T.
2-66-26-0
Uchiyama Y.[7]
Chung H.
6-06-3
Walton A.[3]
Escoffier A.
6-41-66-1
Huang T.
Ocleppo J.
7-56-4
Mcdonald M.[6]
Uesugi K.
6-26-4
Oliveira G.
Wu T.[8]
6-46-766-0
Uchida K.
Samrej K.
7-644-66-2
Tseng C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-26-0
Wong C.[5]
Sin S.
6-43-66-1
Lee K.
Leong M.
6-41-67-5
Paire B.
Noguchi R.
7-57-5
Daniel T.[2]
Ayeni O.
7-656-3