Taro Daniel vs Coleman Wong — Chengdu Round of 32

Chengdu · ATP · Round of 32
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 17 September 2025
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Daniel T.
6-3 6-2
Wong C.
Daniel T.
662
Wong C.
320

Taro Daniel defeated Coleman Wong 6-3 6-2 in the Chengdu round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Daniel T.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
8.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Even
42
43
Break points saved·Even
93
91
Break points won·Dominant
37
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Wong C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1512
Surface ELO
7.1+81 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1567
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1602
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
0.7
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Wong C.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d) · Wong C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.
Musetti L.[1]
6-32-67-65
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.
Nakashima B.[4]
6-47-60
Musetti L.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Musetti L.[1]
Basilashvili N.
6-36-3
Shevchenko A.
Daniel T.
7-623-66-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Giron M.
6-32-67-63
Tabilo A.
Oconnell C.
4-67-56-2
R16
Daniel T.
Griekspoor T.[3]
3-66-46-3
Tabilo A.
Darderi L.[2]
6-46-3
Giron M.
Sonego L.[8]
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[4]
Shang J.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.
Zhou Y.
6-26-4
Musetti L.[1]
Prizmic D.
7-53-66-2
Shevchenko A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
6-727-656-4
Basilashvili N.
Mcdonald M.
6-27-64
R32
Tabilo A.
Thompson J.
6-46-3
Shevchenko A.
Monfils G.
6-736-31-0
Giron M.
Quinn E.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.
Halys Q.
6-736-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Misolic F.
3-66-16-4
Sonego L.[8]
Cerundolo J.
4-66-36-1
Basilashvili N.
Harris B.
7-656-3
Shang J.
Bergs Z.
6-15-76-4
Zhou Y.
Norrie C.[5]
6-736-47-62
Prizmic D.
Atmane T.
6-46-3
Daniel T.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Mcdonald M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-43-66-3