Andrey Rublev vs Nuno Borges — Basel Round of 32

Basel · ATP · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS1
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2024
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#48ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Rublev A.
6-3 6-2
Borges N.
Rublev A.
662
Borges N.
320

Andrey Rublev defeated Nuno Borges 6-3 6-2 in the Basel round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 4–0. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

Head to head

4–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-29Roland GarrosR32clayAndrey Rublev5-7 6.2-7.7 6.2-7.7
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersR64clayAndrey Rublev6-4 1-6 6-1
2026-01-05Hong KongQFhardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-4
2025-02-17DohaR16hardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Borges N.
55
Serve
36
52
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
88
77
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Clear edge
72
54
Deciding sets·Even
97
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
92
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Borges N.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
6.9+134 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1714
7.1Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1769
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
6.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Borges N.
Freshness·Even
94
92

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Borges N.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Shelton B.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[6]
Fils A.[7]
6-37-69
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Rune H.[4]
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Shapovalov D.
6-776-37-63
Shelton B.[6]
Rublev A.[1]
7-56-736-4
Rune H.[4]
Goffin D.
6-26-4
Fils A.[7]
Tsitsipas S.[3]
7-656-3
R16
Rune H.[4]
Stricker D.
6-37-62
Shelton B.[6]
Wawrinka S.
7-627-5
Goffin D.
Humbert U.[5]
3-66-17-67
Rublev A.[1]
Tabilo A.
7-636-1
Fils A.[7]
Martinez P.
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
6-17-66
Shapovalov D.
Bautista Agut R.
6-37-64
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-637-5
R32
Tabilo A.
Cilic M.
7-647-62
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bublik A.
3-66-44-0
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Cerundolo F.
6-36-737-64
Goffin D.
Arnaldi M.
6-756-36-2
Martinez P.
Lehecka J.
6-26-2
Rublev A.[1]
Borges N.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Mannarino A.
6-33-67-5
Shelton B.[6]
Etcheverry T.
6-36-4
Fils A.[7]
Altmaier D.
7-656-3
Humbert U.[5]
Kym J.
6-46-757-5
Stricker D.
Griekspoor T.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Duckworth J.
7-646-3
Shapovalov D.
Shang J.
6-16-4
Bautista Agut R.
Ruud C.[2]
6-33-66-3
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Baez S.
7-56-1
Rune H.[4]
Jarry N.
6-47-63