Qinwen Zheng vs Iga Swiatek — Paris Olympics Semi-final

Paris Olympics · WTA · Semi-final
Qinwen Zheng
CHN
Qinwen Zheng
#138WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
Iga Swiatek
POL1
Iga Swiatek
#3WTA
2064ELO
2008Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
Zheng Q.
6-2 7-5
Swiatek I.
Zheng Q.
672
Swiatek I.
250

Qinwen Zheng defeated Iga Swiatek 6-2 7-5 in the Paris Olympics semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 7–0, but Qinwen Zheng had arrived on a 5-match winning run. Qinwen Zheng claimed a first win over Iga Swiatek in eight meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Qinwen Zheng closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

0–7
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian WellsQFhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-3
2024-02-19DubaiQFhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-2
2024-01-01United CupQFhardIga Swiatek6-2 6-3
2023-08-14CincinnatiR16hardIga Swiatek3-6 6-1 6-1
2023-04-17StuttgartR16clayIga Swiatek6-1 6-4
2022-10-10San DiegoR16hardIga Swiatek6-4 4-6 6-1
2022-05-23Roland GarrosR16clayIga Swiatek6-7(5) 6-0 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Swiatek I.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Swiatek I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Swiatek I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
44%
48%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Swiatek I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
93
100
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Even
100
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Swiatek I.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1811
Surface ELO
6.9+197 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 2064
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.7
Surface form
10.0
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Swiatek I.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
91

Zheng Q.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Swiatek I.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Bronze
Swiatek I.[1]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-1
Final
Zheng Q.
Vekic D.[13]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Vekic D.[13]
Schmiedlova A.
6-46-0
Zheng Q.
Swiatek I.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Collins D.[8]
6-12-64-1
Schmiedlova A.
Krejcikova B.[9]
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Kerber A.
6-746-47-66
Vekic D.[13]
Kostyuk M.[12]
6-42-67-68
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Wang X.
6-36-4
Collins D.[8]
Osorio C.
6-04-66-3
Kerber A.
Fernandez L.[16]
6-46-3
Zheng Q.
Navarro E.[11]
6-777-646-1
Kostyuk M.[12]
Sakkari M.[7]
4-67-656-4
Vekic D.[13]
Gauff C.[2]
7-676-2
Schmiedlova A.
Paolini J.[4]
7-53-67-5
Krejcikova B.[9]
Svitolina E.
7-652-66-4
R32
Krejcikova B.[9]
Wang X.
6-36-2
Sakkari M.[7]
Yuan Y.
6-26-1
Vekic D.[13]
Andreescu B.
6-36-4
Navarro E.[11]
Tomova V.
6-756-46-1
Swiatek I.[1]
Parry D.
6-16-1
Wang X.
Shnaider D.[15]
6-36-1
Fernandez L.[16]
Bucsa C.
7-646-3
Zheng Q.
Rus A.
6-26-4
Collins D.[8]
Wozniacki C.
6-33-66-3
Kerber A.
Cristian J.
6-43-66-4
Schmiedlova A.
Haddad Maia B.[14]
6-46-4
Osorio C.
Yastremska D.
7-646-4
Paolini J.[4]
Linette M.
6-46-1
Gauff C.[2]
Carle M.
6-16-1
Kostyuk M.[12]
Burel C.
7-636-2
Svitolina E.
Pegula J.[5]
4-66-16-3
R64
Collins D.[8]
Siegemund L.
6-32-0
Wang X.
Noskova L.
6-36-3
Tomova V.
Frech M.
6-47-64
Vekic D.[13]
Bronzetti L.
6-27-5
Sakkari M.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-06-1
Parry D.
Podoroska N.
7-667-5
Osorio C.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-46-3
Yastremska D.
Pigossi L.
3-67-56-0
Bucsa C.
Martic P.
6-46-3
Burel C.
Siniakova K.
7-636-4
Kostyuk M.[12]
Sun L.
6-46-3
Linette M.
Andreeva M.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Korpatsch T.
6-26-1
Schmiedlova A.
Boulter K.
6-46-2
Rus A.
Gadecki O.
6-46-1
Zheng Q.
Errani S.
6-06-0
Pegula J.[5]
Golubic V.
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.[9]
Sorribes Tormo S.
4-66-07-63
Yuan Y.
Alexandrova E.
7-56-706-2
Svitolina E.
Uchijima M.
6-26-1
Kerber A.
Osaka N.
7-56-3
Gauff C.[2]
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-0
Navarro E.[11]
Grabher J.
6-26-0
Haddad Maia B.[14]
Gracheva V.
6-44-66-0
Wozniacki C.
Sherif M.
2-67-56-1
Andreescu B.
Tauson C.
6-26-3
Paolini J.[4]
Bogdan A.
7-56-3
Swiatek I.[1]
Begu I.
6-27-5
Fernandez L.[16]
Muchova K.
6-14-66-2
Shnaider D.[15]
Cocciaretto E.
6-27-5
Carle M.
Maria T.
6-06-0
Cristian J.
Garcia C.[17]
5-76-36-4