Lucrezia Stefanini vs Lin Zhu — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 32
Lucrezia Stefanini
ITA
Lucrezia Stefanini
#145WTA
1527ELO
1492Grass ELO
28 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Lin Zhu
CHN7
Lin Zhu
#130WTA
1674ELO
1545Grass ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Stefanini L.
7-6 3-6 7-5
Zhu L.
Stefanini L.
77372
Zhu L.
64651

Lucrezia Stefanini defeated Lin Zhu 7-6 3-6 7-5 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Lin Zhu came in ranked #130, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stefanini L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Zhu L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stefanini L.

Serve advantage — Zhu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stefanini L.Zhu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
58%
Return points won·Even
47%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stefanini L.Zhu L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
37
Break points saved·Dominant
26
64
Break points won·Slight edge
96
91
Deciding sets·Dominant
61
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stefanini L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhu L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Grass Elo 1492
Surface ELO
5.4+54 Grass Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1527
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1674
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stefanini L.Zhu L.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Stefanini L.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 44 games (7d) · Zhu L.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3