Taylor Fritz vs Jack Draper — Munich Quarter-final

Munich · ATP · Quarter-final
Taylor Fritz
USA3
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1761Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Jack Draper
GBR6
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1697Clay ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Fritz T.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Draper J.
Fritz T.
46772
Draper J.
63611

Taylor Fritz defeated Jack Draper 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Munich quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #10, defending last year's semi-final. Taylor Fritz narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersR16hardJack Draper7-5 6-4
2024-10-28Paris MastersR32hardJack Draper7-6(6) 4-6 6-4
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR32clayTaylor Fritz6-7(3) 6-3 6-2
2022-06-13Queen's ClubR32grassJack Draper6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
70%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.6
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Even
87
88
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Clear edge
60
83
Deciding sets·Even
98
96
Tiebreaks·Even
99
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fritz T.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Draper J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+64 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Clay Elo 1697
5.9Overall Elo 1909
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1822
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Draper J.
Freshness·Dominant
72
100

Fritz T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d) · Draper J.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
14°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 85%
Final
Struff J.[4]
Fritz T.[3]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[3]
Garin C.
6-36-4
Struff J.[4]
Rune H.[2]
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Garin C.
Zverev A.[1]
6-46-4
Struff J.[4]
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
7-56-4
Rune H.[2]
Huesler M.
6-47-63
Fritz T.[3]
Draper J.[6]
4-66-37-61
R16
Zverev A.[1]
Rodionov J.
7-636-2
Fritz T.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-36-1
Struff J.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-606-4
Rune H.[2]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Garin C.
Michelsen A.
6-776-26-1
Draper J.[6]
Molleker R.
4-66-16-1
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
Daniel T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Hanfmann Y.
6-26-4
R32
Rodionov J.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Michelsen A.
Rehberg M.
7-626-3
Garin C.
Koepfer D.[7]
7-636-3
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
Marterer M.
6-757-667-63
Moro Canas A.
Thiem D.
6-46-4
Molleker R.
Passaro F.
6-46-2
Draper J.[6]
Kopriva V.
6-15-76-4
Daniel T.
Oconnell C.
6-36-4
Hanfmann Y.
Shevchenko A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Huesler M.
Topo M.
3-66-16-3
Galan D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-626-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Gakhov I.
6-42-66-3