Jaume Munar vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Monte Carlo Masters Qualifying Round 1

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Jaume Munar
ESP11
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1706Clay ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Munar J.
4-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Munar J.
4–
Van De Zandschulp B.
1–

Jaume Munar advanced when Botic Van De Zandschulp retired 4-1 in the Monte Carlo Masters qualifying round 1. Jaume Munar claimed a first win over Botic Van De Zandschulp in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-22Winston-SalemR16hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Munar J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Munar J.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
26
—
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Munar J.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 145). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Munar J.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
77
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Even
66
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Munar J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+15 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1690
5.6Overall Elo 1766
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Munar J.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
95

Munar J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 63%
Q2
Moutet C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[13]
Muller A.
3-66-46-4
Oconnell C.[6]
Vukic A.[9]
6-23-67-65
Bautista Agut R.
Sonego L.[7]
6-12-66-2
Nagal S.
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
7-52-66-2
Munar J.[11]
Hanfmann Y.[1]
6-776-17-5
Coria F.
Rinderknech A.[14]
6-34-66-4
Q1
Nardi L.[13]
Pouille L.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Schwartzman D.
6-36-4
Coria F.
Shevchenko A.[4]
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.
Thiem D.
6-16-2
Muller A.
Lajovic D.[5]
6-26-3
Rinderknech A.[14]
Nys H.
6-36-1
Oconnell C.[6]
Marterer M.
7-53-66-3
Vukic A.[9]
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Cobolli F.[8]
6-26-3
Hanfmann Y.[1]
Gaston H.
4-66-06-4
Sonego L.[7]
Goffin D.
4-66-46-4
Moutet C.
Michelsen A.[10]
6-16-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Van Assche L.
2-66-26-3
Munar J.[11]
Van De Zandschulp B.
4-1