Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jaume Munar — Winston-Salem Round of 16

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 16
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
[2]
#55ATP
1758ELO
1718Hard ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
ESP
Jaume Munar
[15]
#41ATP
1799ELO
1760Hard ELO
$439kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWL

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Jaume Munar 6-3 6-3 in the Winston-Salem round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jaume Munar came in ranked #41, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Botic Van De Zandschulp claimed a first win over Jaume Munar in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Munar J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1718
Surface ELO
5.6+42 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1758
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1799
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Munar J.
330

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-08Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayJaume Munar4-1 RET

Statistics

Recent form
Van De Zandschulp B.Munar J.
63%1st serve in+1%62%
73%1st serve points won73%
46%2nd serve points won+5%51%
63%Service points won+2%65%
38%Return points won+2%36%
59%Break points saved59%
6.2Aces / match+0.75.5
4.4Double faults / match+1.82.6

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Mannarino A.
Djere L.
7-616-4
Semi-finals
Mannarino A.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-06-4
Djere L.
Huesler M.
7-637-65
Quarter-finals
Mannarino A.
Cressy M.[4]
6-47-63
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Bonzi B.[10]
7-667-61
Huesler M.
Draper J.[13]
6-46-4
Djere L.
Gasquet R.
6-43-67-66
R16
Djere L.
Kubler J.
7-646-796-3
Huesler M.
Ivashka I.[11]
7-623-67-63
Gasquet R.
Johnson S.
6-736-46-3
Mannarino A.
Ramos A.[8]
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[10]
Monteiro T.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[4]
Sonego L.[14]
6-746-27-63
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Munar J.[15]
6-36-3
Draper J.[13]
Thiem D.
6-16-4
R32
Draper J.[13]
Fognini F.
6-24-66-1
Ivashka I.[11]
Gojowczyk P.
6-46-2
Djere L.
Sousa J.[16]
4-66-37-65
Gasquet R.
Musetti L.[5]
7-654-66-1
Mannarino A.
Ruusuvuori E.[9]
6-46-1
Cressy M.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[10]
Edmund K.
6-47-65
Munar J.[15]
Tseng C.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Griekspoor T.
7-656-3
Thiem D.
Dimitrov G.[1]
0-64-2
Sonego L.[14]
Tabilo A.
7-56-1
Monteiro T.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-46-1
Johnson S.
Martinez P.[12]
7-626-2
Huesler M.
Ymer M.
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Kwon S.
7-56-2
Ramos A.[8]
Millman J.
6-46-4
R64
Thiem D.
Wolf J.
6-757-57-66
Fognini F.
Lajovic D.
7-57-5
Gojowczyk P.
Lehecka J.
6-46-3
Kwon S.
Altmaier D.
6-16-4
Djere L.
Goffin D.
6-33-66-3
Millman J.
Gaston H.
6-26-3
Monteiro T.
Kudla D.
7-617-5
Edmund K.
Pervolarakis M.
6-27-5
Gasquet R.
Majchrzak K.
6-756-21-0
Ymer M.
Coria F.
6-26-3
Griekspoor T.
Daniel T.
7-636-3
Mannarino A.
Oconnell C.
7-646-737-63
Duckworth J.
Kokkinakis T.
4-66-37-65
Tabilo A.
Mochizuki S.
4-66-26-4
Tseng C.
Fucsovics M.
6-11-66-3
Johnson S.
Nava E.
6-36-2