Albert Ramos vs Pedro Cachin — Cordoba Round of 32

Cordoba · ATP · Round of 32
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
clay
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Ramos A.
6-4 3-6 6-1
Cachin P.
Ramos A.
6362
Cachin P.
4611

Albert Ramos defeated Pedro Cachin 6-4 3-6 6-1 in the Cordoba round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Pedro Cachin came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Albert Ramos claimed a first win over Pedro Cachin in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-31KitzbuhelR16clayPedro Cachin7-5 6-3
2023-07-17GstaadFclayPedro Cachin3-6 6-0 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Cachin P.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Cachin P.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Cachin P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
22
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
77
Break points won·Dominant
49
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cachin P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.6
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Darderi L.
Bagnis F.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.
Coria F.
6-37-5
Darderi L.
Baez S.[2]
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.
Munar J.
7-56-4
Baez S.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
Coria F.
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-36-4
Darderi L.
Hanfmann Y.[7]
7-626-1
R16
Baez S.[2]
Dellien H.
4-66-36-4
Darderi L.
Ofner S.[4]
6-06-3
Bagnis F.
Carballes Baena R.[8]
7-656-4
Munar J.
Cerundolo F.[1]
7-56-4
Hanfmann Y.[7]
Burruchaga R.
3-66-16-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Tirante T.
6-26-756-2
Coria F.
Ramos A.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-56-4
R32
Bagnis F.
Cerundolo J.
6-46-2
Coria F.
Altmaier D.[5]
5-76-36-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Garin C.
1-67-633-0
Munar J.
Galan D.
6-26-4
Burruchaga R.
Schwartzman D.
6-14-66-4
Ramos A.
Cachin P.
6-43-66-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Gomez F.
6-16-4
Hanfmann Y.[7]
Varillas J.
5-77-616-1
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Navone M.
3-66-36-3
Darderi L.
Barrios Vera T.
4-66-16-2
Tirante T.
Comesana F.
6-17-64
Dellien H.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-42-66-3