Pedro Cachin vs Albert Ramos — Kitzbuhel Round of 16

Kitzbuhel · ATP · Round of 16
ARG3
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Cachin P.
7-5 6-3
Ramos A.
Cachin P.
762
Ramos A.
530

Pedro Cachin defeated Albert Ramos 7-5 6-3 in the Kitzbuhel round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Ramos came in defending last year's semi-final, but Pedro Cachin had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 9 on clay. Pedro Cachin extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Pedro Cachin closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05CordobaR32clayAlbert Ramos6-4 3-6 6-1
2023-07-17GstaadFclayPedro Cachin3-6 6-0 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
95
Break points won·Dominant
21
49
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
46
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cachin P.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ramos A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
7.9
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
0.6
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Country comfort
5.4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Baez S.
Thiem D.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Baez S.
Etcheverry T.[1]
7-653-66-4
Thiem D.
Djere L.[5]
6-737-57-68
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[1]
Galan D.
6-766-36-4
Baez S.
Molcan A.
6-46-3
Djere L.[5]
Cachin P.[3]
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Rinderknech A.
4-66-36-4
R16
Galan D.
Altmaier D.[8]
3-66-27-68
Rinderknech A.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
7-636-3
Molcan A.
Ofner S.[4]
4-67-57-65
Baez S.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-16-2
Djere L.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-656-3
Cachin P.[3]
Ramos A.
7-56-3
Thiem D.
Zhang Z.
1-66-36-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-26-2
R32
Thiem D.
Bagnis F.
7-637-66
Zhang Z.
Lajovic D.[7]
6-36-2
Andreozzi G.
Misolic F.
5-76-46-2
Galan D.
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Huesler M.
6-756-26-4
Molcan A.
Van Assche L.
6-46-3
Baez S.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-2
Djere L.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.
Cerundolo J.
6-736-46-2
Ramos A.
Varillas J.
6-17-5
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Pella G.
6-26-4