Francisco Cerundolo vs Casper Ruud — Paris Masters Round of 32

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Francisco Cerundolo
ARG
Francisco Cerundolo
#22ATP
1931ELO
1880Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$11MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Casper Ruud
NOR8
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Cerundolo F.
7-5 6-4
Ruud C.
Cerundolo F.
762
Ruud C.
540

Francisco Cerundolo defeated Casper Ruud 7-5 6-4 in the Paris Masters round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, defending last year's round of 16. Francisco Cerundolo extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-23Madrid MastersSFclayCasper Ruud6-4 7-5
2025-03-19Miami MastersR16hardFrancisco Cerundolo6-4 6-2
2024-09-20Laver CupRRhardFrancisco Cerundolo6-4 6-4
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR16clayCasper Ruud6-3 6-4
2023-05-08Rome MastersQFclayCasper Ruud7-6(5) 6-4
2023-04-17BarcelonaR16clayFrancisco Cerundolo7-6(5) 6-3
2022-07-11BastadR16clayFrancisco Cerundolo6-4 3-6 7-5
2022-03-21Miami MastersSFhardCasper Ruud6-4 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cerundolo F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cerundolo F.Ruud C.
13
Serve
59
67
Return
31

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo F.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo F.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
91
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Slight edge
86
75
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
99
Tiebreaks·Even
93
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo F.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ruud C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Hard Elo 1880
Surface ELO
5.0+9 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1983
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.7
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
5.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
6.3
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo F.Ruud C.
Freshness·Even
98
98

Cerundolo F.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Dimitrov G.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Rublev A.[5]
5-77-637-5
Dimitrov G.
Tsitsipas S.[7]
6-36-717-63
Quarter-finals
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-14-66-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Khachanov K.[16]
6-36-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Rune H.[6]
7-56-736-4
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.[13]
4-66-36-1
R16
De Minaur A.[13]
Sinner J.[4]
W/O
Khachanov K.[16]
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-2
Dimitrov G.
Bublik A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Rublev A.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Zverev A.[10]
7-626-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Griekspoor T.
4-67-626-4
R32
Altmaier D.
Fritz T.[9]
W/O
Bublik A.
Jarry N.
7-637-63
Hurkacz H.[11]
Bautista Agut R.
6-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-36-2
Griekspoor T.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-46-2
Sinner J.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-767-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Paul T.[12]
6-42-66-3
Rublev A.[5]
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.
Ruud C.[8]
7-56-4
Dimitrov G.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-747-62
Zverev A.[10]
Humbert U.
6-46-737-65
Khachanov K.[16]
Djere L.
6-47-5
Safiullin R.
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-37-64
De Minaur A.[13]
Lajovic D.
4-66-46-4
R64
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Musetti L.
6-26-746-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Struff J.
7-636-4
Humbert U.
Giron M.
6-46-3
Fritz T.[9]
Baez S.
6-16-4
Paul T.[12]
Gasquet R.
0-66-27-66
Griekspoor T.
Eubanks C.
6-726-36-4
Nishioka Y.
Thompson J.
7-654-66-2
Etcheverry T.
Kecmanovic M.
4-67-666-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shelton B.[15]
7-645-76-3
Altmaier D.
Fils A.
6-26-4
Thiem D.
Wawrinka S.
3-66-37-5
Lajovic D.
Bonzi B.
7-56-3
De Minaur A.[13]
Murray A.
7-654-67-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mannarino A.
6-47-5
Cerundolo F.
Monfils G.
4-67-627-5
Bautista Agut R.
Lehecka J.
6-46-2
Djere L.
Van Assche L.
6-766-46-4
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
7-646-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Korda S.
6-36-766-3
Khachanov K.[16]
Purcell M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Wolf J.
1-66-46-2
Zverev A.[10]
Fucsovics M.
4-67-56-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
7-57-66