Taylor Fritz vs Sebastian Baez — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Taylor Fritz
USA9
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1709Hard ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Fritz T.
6-1 6-4
Baez S.
Fritz T.
662
Baez S.
140

Taylor Fritz defeated Sebastian Baez 6-1 6-4 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #10, leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's round of 32. Taylor Fritz extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupRRhardSebastian Baez4-6 7-5 6-4
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR32clayTaylor Fritz6-2 6-3
2024-03-04Indian Wells MastersR32hardTaylor Fritz6-2 6-2
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR32hardTaylor Fritz6-1 6-2
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardTaylor Fritz6-1 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baez S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve advantage — Fritz T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fritz T.Baez S.
76
Serve
5
32
Return
63

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Baez S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
72%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Baez S.
Clutch Rating·Even
87
87
Break points saved·Even
100
96
Break points won·Dominant
60
86
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fritz T.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Baez S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+130 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1709
7.9Overall Elo 1909
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1759
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
5.0
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Baez S.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
96

Fritz T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d) · Baez S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Dimitrov G.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Rublev A.[5]
5-77-637-5
Dimitrov G.
Tsitsipas S.[7]
6-36-717-63
Quarter-finals
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-14-66-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Khachanov K.[16]
6-36-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Rune H.[6]
7-56-736-4
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.[13]
4-66-36-1
R16
De Minaur A.[13]
Sinner J.[4]
W/O
Khachanov K.[16]
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-2
Dimitrov G.
Bublik A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Rublev A.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Zverev A.[10]
7-626-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Griekspoor T.
4-67-626-4
R32
Altmaier D.
Fritz T.[9]
W/O
Bublik A.
Jarry N.
7-637-63
Hurkacz H.[11]
Bautista Agut R.
6-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-36-2
Griekspoor T.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-46-2
Sinner J.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-767-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Paul T.[12]
6-42-66-3
Rublev A.[5]
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.
Ruud C.[8]
7-56-4
Dimitrov G.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-747-62
Zverev A.[10]
Humbert U.
6-46-737-65
Khachanov K.[16]
Djere L.
6-47-5
Safiullin R.
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-37-64
De Minaur A.[13]
Lajovic D.
4-66-46-4
R64
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Musetti L.
6-26-746-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Struff J.
7-636-4
Humbert U.
Giron M.
6-46-3
Fritz T.[9]
Baez S.
6-16-4
Paul T.[12]
Gasquet R.
0-66-27-66
Griekspoor T.
Eubanks C.
6-726-36-4
Nishioka Y.
Thompson J.
7-654-66-2
Etcheverry T.
Kecmanovic M.
4-67-666-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shelton B.[15]
7-645-76-3
Altmaier D.
Fils A.
6-26-4
Thiem D.
Wawrinka S.
3-66-37-5
Lajovic D.
Bonzi B.
7-56-3
De Minaur A.[13]
Murray A.
7-654-67-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mannarino A.
6-47-5
Cerundolo F.
Monfils G.
4-67-627-5
Bautista Agut R.
Lehecka J.
6-46-2
Djere L.
Van Assche L.
6-766-46-4
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
7-646-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Korda S.
6-36-766-3
Khachanov K.[16]
Purcell M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Wolf J.
1-66-46-2
Zverev A.[10]
Fucsovics M.
4-67-56-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
7-57-66