Felix Auger Aliassime vs Botic Van De ZandschulpBasel Round of 16

Basel · ATP · Round of 16
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2023
hard
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Auger Aliassime F.
6-4 6-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
Van De Zandschulp B.
420

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-4 6-2 in the Basel round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending the title. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

21
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-06Rome MastersR64clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-1 7-6(6)
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersR64hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-3
2021-11-08StockholmQFhardFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Van De Zandschulp B.
74
Serve
41
44
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
77
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Clear edge
50
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+222 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1711
7.8Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1743
4.6
H2H
5.4
4.0
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
59
89

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast