Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Felix Auger AliassimeIndian Wells Masters Round of 64

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Round of 64
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-6 6-7 6-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Van De Zandschulp B.
776462
Auger Aliassime F.
647731

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Felix Auger Aliassime 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Indian Wells Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's round of 64. Botic Van De Zandschulp claimed a first win over Felix Auger Aliassime in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

03
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-06Rome MastersR64clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-1 7-6(6)
2023-10-23BaselR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-2
2021-11-08StockholmQFhardFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Auger Aliassime F.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Auger Aliassime F.
41
Serve
74
43
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
9.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
77
84
Break points saved·Even
98
100
Break points won·Clear edge
68
50
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
8.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Hard Elo 1711
Surface ELO
7.8+222 Hard Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1958
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
8.9
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
5.7
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
89
59

Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%