Clara Burel vs Lucrezia Stefanini — Monastir Quarter-final

Monastir · WTA · Quarter-final
Clara Burel
FRA8
Clara Burel
#630WTA
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Lucrezia Stefanini
ITA
Lucrezia Stefanini
#145WTA
1527ELO
1497Hard ELO
28 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Burel C.
6-3 6-1
Stefanini L.
Burel C.
662
Stefanini L.
310

Clara Burel defeated Lucrezia Stefanini 6-3 6-1 in the Monastir quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lucrezia Stefanini came in ranked #145, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Burel C.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Stefanini L.

Stefanini L.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Burel C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burel C.Stefanini L.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
72%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
44%
Service points won·Even
53%
53%
Return points won·Even
46%
47%
Break points saved·Even
52%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 152). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burel C.Stefanini L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
46
26
Break points won·Slight edge
89
96
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burel C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Stefanini L.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Burel C.Stefanini L.
Freshness·Slight edge
78
83

Burel C.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 55 games (7d) · Stefanini L.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 44 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Burel C.[8]
6-26-1
Paolini J.[1]
Tsurenko L.[4]
6-24-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Paolini J.[1]
Bronzetti L.[6]
7-57-63
Tsurenko L.[4]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-36-2
Burel C.[8]
Stefanini L.
6-36-1
R16
Stefanini L.
Kawa K.
6-46-1
Paolini J.[1]
Marcinko P.
6-43-66-2
Bronzetti L.[6]
Errani S.
6-36-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Zavatska K.
4-67-56-2
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.
6-26-1
Mertens E.[2]
Shymanovich I.
6-36-2
Tsurenko L.[4]
Liu C.
6-17-5
Burel C.[8]
Andreeva E.
6-05-77-62
R32
Stefanini L.
Rosatello C.
5-76-36-1
Paolini J.[1]
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Zidansek T.
6-26-766-3
Bronzetti L.[6]
Kucova K.
6-16-1
Tsurenko L.[4]
Paquet C.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Bektas E.
6-27-65
Parrizas Diaz N.
Frech M.[7]
6-20-66-4
Burel C.[8]
Bucsa C.
6-26-2
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-0
Kawa K.
Trevisan M.[3]
6-33-67-5
Podoroska N.
Schmiedlova A.[5]
3-66-47-5
Shymanovich I.
Pigossi L.
6-36-2
Mertens E.[2]
Eala A.
7-56-0
Hontama M.
Bolsova A.
4-66-46-0
Marcinko P.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-676-2
Zavatska K.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-46-4