Albert Ramos vs Joao Sousa — Lisbon CH Quarter-final

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Ramos A.
6-4 6-2
Sousa J.
Ramos A.
662
Sousa J.
420

Albert Ramos defeated Joao Sousa 6-4 6-2 in the Lisbon CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 6–2. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 7–2.

Key context

Head to head

6–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-06CordobaQFclayAlbert Ramos6-4 2-6 6-1
2019-05-20GenevaR16clayAlbert Ramos6-0 6-3
2017-10-09Shanghai MastersR64hardAlbert Ramos3-6 6-3 7-5
2017-02-27Sao PauloSFclayAlbert Ramos6-7(5) 7-5 6-2
2017-01-09AucklandR32hardJoao Sousa6-1 7-5
2015-03-25Miami MastersR128hardAlbert Ramos6-2 6-2
2014-02-17Rio de JaneiroR16clayJoao Sousa7-6(6) 2-6 6-3
2012-04-30EstorilQFclayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
35
Break points saved·Even
95
91
Break points won·Dominant
49
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
48
Tiebreaks·Even
22
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.0
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[2]
Hassan B.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ramos A.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Hemery C.
6-46-3
Agamenone F.
Bonadio R.
7-657-5
Hassan B.
Roca Batalla O.
7-616-4
Ramos A.[1]
Sousa J.
6-46-2
R16
Ramos A.[1]
Elias G.
7-676-4
Hassan B.
Gakhov I.[5]
7-56-1
Roca Batalla O.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-47-62
Cobolli F.[2]
Krutykh O.
7-626-3
Hemery C.
Bailly G.
7-56-746-1
Sousa J.
Sousa P.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Mikrut L.
7-646-3
Bonadio R.
Lavagno E.
3-66-36-2
R32
Cobolli F.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-45-76-0
Lavagno E.
Valkusz M.
3-67-640-0
Hassan B.
Forti F.
3-66-16-3
Agamenone F.
Gigante M.
6-47-64
Bailly G.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-3
Sousa P.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-4
Sousa J.
Rocha H.
6-27-5
Krutykh O.
Campana Lee G.
5-76-26-3
Bonadio R.
Skatov T.[3]
6-46-3
Roca Batalla O.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Fatic N.
6-26-2
Mikrut L.
Travaglia S.
1-66-27-61
Hemery C.
Weis A.
6-16-3
Ramos A.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-43-66-2
Gakhov I.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2