Albert Ramos vs Joao Sousa — Cordoba Quarter-final

Cordoba · ATP · Quarter-final
ESP3
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2023
clay
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Ramos A.
6-4 2-6 6-1
Sousa J.
Ramos A.
6262
Sousa J.
4611

Albert Ramos defeated Joao Sousa 6-4 2-6 6-1 in the Cordoba quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending the title. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

5–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-05-20GenevaR16clayAlbert Ramos6-0 6-3
2017-10-09Shanghai MastersR64hardAlbert Ramos3-6 6-3 7-5
2017-02-27Sao PauloSFclayAlbert Ramos6-7(5) 7-5 6-2
2017-01-09AucklandR32hardJoao Sousa6-1 7-5
2015-03-25Miami MastersR128hardAlbert Ramos6-2 6-2
2014-02-17Rio de JaneiroR16clayJoao Sousa7-6(6) 2-6 6-3
2012-04-30EstorilQFclayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
35
Break points saved·Even
95
91
Break points won·Dominant
49
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
48
Tiebreaks·Even
22
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[4]
Coria F.[6]
6-13-66-3
Semi-finals
Baez S.[4]
Dellien H.
6-46-4
Coria F.[6]
Ramos A.[3]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Ramos A.[3]
Sousa J.
6-42-66-1
Coria F.[6]
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-33-0
Baez S.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
6-13-66-1
Dellien H.
Cerundolo J.
6-756-46-0
R16
Coria F.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-33-1
Barrios Vera T.
Zapata Miralles B.[8]
5-76-46-3
Baez S.[4]
Darderi L.
6-36-4
Cerundolo J.
Schwartzman D.[1]
7-666-1
Ramos A.[3]
Lajovic D.
6-42-66-2
Sousa J.
Garin C.
7-57-66
Dellien H.
Pella G.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-33-67-5
R32
Barrios Vera T.
Galan D.
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-766-37-5
Garin C.
Martinez P.[7]
7-632-66-0
Coria F.[6]
Monteiro T.
6-756-16-2
Sousa J.
Etcheverry T.
3-67-656-4
Pella G.
Vavassori A.
6-26-2
Cecchinato M.
Bagnis F.
6-27-64
Cerundolo J.
Andujar P.
6-41-0
Darderi L.
Gaston H.
6-46-3
Dellien H.
Cachin P.[5]
6-36-4
Delbonis F.
Tabilo A.
6-786-27-66
Lajovic D.
Varillas J.
7-636-3