Coco Gauff vs Maria SakkariBeijing Quarter-final

Beijing · WTA · Quarter-final
#4WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
#37WTA
1812ELO
1796Hard ELO
$901kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLLLWWL
Gauff C.
6-2 6-4
Sakkari M.
Gauff C.
662
Sakkari M.
240

Coco Gauff defeated Maria Sakkari 6-2 6-4 in the Beijing quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #4. Coco Gauff extended the head-to-head to 6–5.

Key context

Head to head

55
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupQFhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-2
2025-03-18MiamiR32hardCoco Gauff6-2 6-4
2025-03-05Indian WellsR32hardCoco Gauff7-6(1) 6-2
2024-03-06Indian WellsSFhardMaria Sakkari6-4 6-7(5) 6-2
2023-07-31WashingtonFhardCoco Gauff6-2 6-3
2022-05-09RomeR16clayMaria Sakkari6-4 7-5
2022-02-21DohaQFhardMaria Sakkari6-3 6-3
2021-05-10RomeR32clayCoco Gauff6-1 1-6 6-1
2021-01-06Abu DhabiR32hardMaria Sakkari7-5 6-2
2020-08-24CincinnatiR64hardMaria Sakkari6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sakkari M.

Sakkari M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Sakkari M.
25
Serve
24
100
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
99
81
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Clear edge
100
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+239 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1796
8.1Overall Elo 2071
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1812
3.9
H2H
6.1
9.2
Surface form
8.1
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.6
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
65
92

Gauff C.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d) · Sakkari M.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw