Andrey Rublev vs Cameron Norrie — Beijing Round of 32

Beijing · ATP · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS5
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 27 September 2023
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#29ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Rublev A.
4-6 6-1 6-4
Norrie C.
Rublev A.
4662
Norrie C.
6141

Andrey Rublev defeated Cameron Norrie 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the Beijing round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #13. Andrey Rublev narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-20ViennaR32hardCameron Norrie6-2 6-7(5) 6-2
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR16hardCameron Norrie6-2 6-4
2022-08-29US OpenR16hardAndrey Rublev6-4 6-4 6-4
2021-09-27San DiegoSFhardCameron Norrie3-6 6-3 6-4
2020-10-12St PetersburgQFhardAndrey Rublev6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Norrie C.
55
Serve
45
52
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
89
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Slight edge
72
83
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Even
92
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 44 days (−0.7)
Norrie C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+60 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1789
5.2Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1829
2.8
H2H
7.2
5.2
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Norrie C.
Freshness·Even
94
94

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Norrie C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
24°COvercast
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 30%
Final
Sinner J.[6]
Medvedev D.[2]
7-627-62
Semi-finals
Medvedev D.[2]
Zverev A.[8]
6-46-3
Sinner J.[6]
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Ruud C.[7]
6-46-2
Sinner J.[6]
Dimitrov G.
6-43-66-2
Medvedev D.[2]
Humbert U.
6-43-66-1
Zverev A.[8]
Jarry N.
6-16-756-3
R16
Medvedev D.[2]
De Minaur A.
7-636-3
Jarry N.
Arnaldi M.
6-747-646-3
Humbert U.
Rublev A.[5]
5-76-37-63
Alcaraz C.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-2
Ruud C.[7]
Etcheverry T.
1-67-57-67
Dimitrov G.
Rune H.[3]
6-37-5
Sinner J.[6]
Nishioka Y.
6-26-0
Zverev A.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-746-26-1
R32
Rune H.[3]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-46-4
Humbert U.
Sonego L.
7-53-66-0
Jarry N.
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-46-4
Sinner J.[6]
Evans D.
6-46-726-3
Etcheverry T.
Harris L.
6-757-646-3
Alcaraz C.[1]
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-3
Musetti L.
Khachanov K.
6-31-66-2
Ruud C.[7]
Struff J.
7-656-3
Dimitrov G.
Mcdonald M.
2-67-646-1
Zverev A.[8]
Schwartzman D.
6-726-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Zhou Y.
6-26-2
Arnaldi M.
Wolf J.
6-26-2
Rublev A.[5]
Norrie C.
4-66-16-4
De Minaur A.
Murray A.
6-35-77-66
Medvedev D.[2]
Paul T.
6-26-1
Nishioka Y.
Shang J.
5-77-56-1