Andrey Rublev vs Casper Ruud — Bastad Final

Bastad · ATP · Final
Andrey Rublev
RUS1
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Rublev A.
7-6 6-0
Ruud C.
Rublev A.
7762
Ruud C.
6300

Andrey Rublev defeated Casper Ruud 7-6 6-0 in the Bastad final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #12, defending last year's round of 16. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

4–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-11-11Tour FinalsRRhardCasper Ruud6-4 5-7 6-2
2022-11-14Tour FinalsSFhardCasper Ruud6-2 6-4
2021-11-15Tour FinalsRRhardCasper Ruud2-6 7-5 7-6(5)
2021-04-12Monte Carlo MastersSFclayAndrey Rublev6-3 7-5
2021-02-08Australian OpenR16hardAndrey Rublev6-2 7-6(3) 0-0 RET
2020-09-21HamburgSFclayAndrey Rublev6-4 6-2
2019-07-22HamburgR16clayAndrey Rublev3-6 7-5 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Ruud C.
14
Serve
54
62
Return
69

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
91
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Even
72
75
Deciding sets·Even
97
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Ruud C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1872
Surface ELO
6.1+101 Clay Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1983
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.9
Surface form
7.7
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
6.2
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Ruud C.
Freshness·Even
94
97

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ruud C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CDrizzle
Wind 23 km/hHumidity 90%
Final
Rublev A.[1]
Ruud C.[1]
7-636-0
Semi-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Cerundolo F.[4]
7-666-776-3
Ruud C.[1]
Musetti L.[3]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[4]
Coria F.
6-36-3
Rublev A.[1]
Zverev A.[5]
6-26-3
Ruud C.[1]
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Misolic F.
4-66-16-2
R16
Coria F.
Borg L.
6-46-2
Rublev A.[1]
Kotov P.
6-37-64
Cerundolo F.[4]
Van Assche L.
6-26-3
Ruud C.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-4
Ofner S.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-4
Musetti L.[3]
Arnaldi M.
6-34-67-66
Zverev A.[5]
Monteiro T.
6-16-0
Misolic F.
Kovalik J.
4-67-666-4
R32
Misolic F.
Lajovic D.
7-647-64
Coria F.
Baez S.[8]
6-44-67-65
Shevchenko A.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Dellien H.
6-37-63
Ofner S.
Etcheverry T.[6]
4-66-17-5
Arnaldi M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-42-67-60
Kovalik J.
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
6-36-4
Borg L.
Ymer E.
7-656-3
Van Assche L.
Madaras D.
7-626-4
Zverev A.[5]
Molcan A.
6-43-67-5
Monteiro T.
Galan D.
5-76-46-4
Kotov P.
Cecchinato M.
6-16-2