Madison Keys vs Petra Martic — Eastbourne Quarter-final

Eastbourne · WTA · Quarter-final
Madison Keys
USA2
Madison Keys
#23WTA
1987ELO
1843Grass ELO
$1.1MYTD
$24MCAREER
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
CRO
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1618Grass ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Keys M.
6-4 6-1
Martic P.
Keys M.
662
Martic P.
410

Madison Keys defeated Petra Martic 6-4 6-1 in the Eastbourne quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Madison Keys came in ranked #23, defending last year's round of 16. Madison Keys narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-02-28MonterreyR32hardPetra Martic5-7 7-6(3) 6-3
2019-10-22ZhuhaiRRhardMadison Keys6-3 6-4
2017-05-29Roland GarrosR64clayPetra Martic3-6 6-3 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Keys M.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Keys M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Keys M.Martic P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Keys M.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
94
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
85
Break points won·Clear edge
90
66
Deciding sets·Slight edge
97
88
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
96
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Keys M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Martic P.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.0+225 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Grass Elo 1618
8.6Overall Elo 1987
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1673
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.5
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.3
Country comfort
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Keys M.Martic P.
Freshness·
84
—

Keys M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
20°CPartly cloudy
Wind 26 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Keys M.[2]
Kasatkina D.[9]
6-27-613
Semi-finals
Keys M.[2]
Gauff C.[5]
6-36-3
Kasatkina D.[9]
Giorgi C.
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Giorgi C.
Ostapenko J.[3]
7-68
Kasatkina D.[9]
Garcia C.[2]
6-22-1
Gauff C.[5]
Pegula J.[3]
6-36-3
Keys M.[2]
Martic P.
6-46-1
R16
Keys M.[2]
Wang X.
6-27-63
Martic P.
Haddad Maia B.[8]
6-43-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Giorgi C.
Jabeur O.[4]
6-36-2
Kasatkina D.[9]
Pliskova K.
3-66-36-3
Garcia C.[2]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Gauff C.[5]
Burrage J.
6-16-1
Pegula J.[3]
Osorio C.[6]
6-21-66-3
R32
Keys M.[2]
Martincova T.
7-646-4
Dart H.
Zhang S.
7-56-756-1
Pliskova K.
Mertens E.
6-736-33-0
Jabeur O.[4]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Strycova B.
6-46-3
Gauff C.[5]
Pera B.
6-36-2
Bogdan A.
Cirstea S.
6-32-66-3
Osorio C.[6]
Rogers S.
6-46-4
Wang X.
Marino R.
6-46-2
Haddad Maia B.[8]
Bouzkova M.
3-66-37-63
Pegula J.[3]
Zheng Q.
6-36-4
Giorgi C.
Watson H.
6-36-4
Kasatkina D.[9]
Kalinina A.
6-36-1
Burrage J.
Davis L.
4-66-46-3
Martic P.
Boulter K.
6-47-5
Garcia C.[2]
Brengle M.
6-17-5