Ryan Peniston vs Jiri Vesely — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1440Grass ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
grass
CZE
Jiri Vesely
#2142ATP
33 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
Peniston R.
6-4 6-2
Vesely J.
Peniston R.
662
Vesely J.
420

Ryan Peniston defeated Jiri Vesely 6-4 6-2 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Ryan Peniston came in ranked #417, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Vesely J.

Vesely J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Vesely J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
9.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (136 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Vesely J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
46
Break points saved·Dominant
60
95
Break points won·Clear edge
25
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Vesely J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Murray A.[2]
Rodionov J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Murray A.[2]
Thompson J.
7-656-3
Rodionov J.
Bergs Z.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Murray A.[2]
Kubler J.[5]
3-66-36-4
Rodionov J.
Diallo G.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Lestienne C.[6]
7-626-3
Thompson J.
Hijikata R.
7-616-2
R16
Hijikata R.
Ivashka I.[7]
7-627-64
Thompson J.
Svajda Z.
6-27-5
Kubler J.[5]
Peniston R.
6-37-65
Murray A.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
7-616-4
Bergs Z.
Saville L.
6-27-64
Diallo G.
Evans D.[1]
7-56-2
Rodionov J.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[6]
Kudla D.
7-646-4
R32
Kudla D.
Oconnell C.
6-35-76-2
Peniston R.
Vesely J.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Broady L.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-2
Murray A.[2]
Chung H.
6-36-2
Lestienne C.[6]
Cox D.
3-66-37-5
Yunchaokete B.
Wendelken H.
7-627-5
Evans D.[1]
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Ivashka I.[7]
Grenier H.
7-56-1
Saville L.
Popyrin A.
6-736-47-66
Eubanks C.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-36-776-3
Thompson J.
Mcdonald M.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.[5]
Brouwer G.
6-17-64
Hijikata R.
Harris B.
6-37-5
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.
7-666-3
Bergs Z.
Whitehouse M.
7-646-2