Elizabeth Mandlik vs Laura PigossiRoland Garros Qualifying Final

Roland Garros · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
#185WTA
1530ELO
1468Clay ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
#252WTA
1478ELO
1453Clay ELO
31 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Mandlik E.
6-2 2-6 7-5
Pigossi L.
Mandlik E.
6272
Pigossi L.
2651

Elizabeth Mandlik defeated Laura Pigossi 6-2 2-6 7-5 in the Roland Garros qualifying final on clay. Elizabeth Mandlik claimed a first win over Laura Pigossi in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

01
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-08Sao PauloR32hardLaura Pigossi2-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mandlik E.serving39% hold

wins 46% of points on serve vs Pigossi L.

Pigossi L.serving32% hold

wins 43% of points on serve vs Mandlik E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
55%
53%
Return points won·Even
47%
46%
Break points saved·Even
50%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
1.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
29
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
11
19
Break points won·Slight edge
95
85
Deciding sets·Even
71
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
69
96

Mandlik E.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Pigossi L.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q1
Osorio C.
Serban R.
6-46-3
Karatantcheva S.
Contreras Gomez F.
3-66-16-3
Arango E.
Sakatsume H.
6-46-1
Andreeva M.
Kudermetova P.
6-16-4
Chwalinska M.
Stefanini L.
6-26-1
Timofeeva M.
Melnikova M.
6-26-1
Townsend T.
Stevanovic N.
7-616-2
Juvan K.
Bandecchi S.
6-46-4
Rus A.
Albie A.
6-26-3
Palicova B.
Hosogi S.
6-06-4
Raina A.
Dartron E.
7-55-76-2
Uchijima M.
Papamichail D.
6-26-2
Zidansek T.
Abduraimova N.
7-624-66-2
Zakharova A.
Zuger J.
6-16-4
Paquet C.
Vicens Mas R.
3-66-26-2
Bolsova A.
Montgomery R.
6-16-3
Carle M.
Dolehide C.
6-16-2
Fourlis J.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-44-66-3
Ferro F.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-31-66-1
Alves C.
Lys E.
6-23-66-3
Bejlek S.
Hartono A.
6-726-46-4
Zhao C.
Kawa K.
6-45-76-1
Radovanovic N.
Boisson L.
1-66-27-5
Hruncakova V.
Kartal S.
2-67-56-4
Jani R.
Jang S.
6-46-3
Robbe A.
Hon P.
6-27-66
Von Deichmann K.
Snigur D.
6-16-2
Fruhvirtova B.
Ruzic A.
3-66-27-610
Hunter S.
Golubic V.
6-46-2
Barthel M.
Tubello A.
6-41-66-2
Krueger A.
Miyazaki Y.
6-26-4
Boulter K.
Brancaccio N.
6-24-66-4
Bjorklund M.
Korpatsch T.
7-56-4
Hercog P.
Tan H.
5-76-07-64
Marcinko P.
Sebov K.
3-66-06-2
Tauson C.
Swan K.
6-46-2
Mandlik E.
Naef C.
7-56-3
Rodionova A.
Wurth T.
7-6106-0
Noha Akugue N.
Lene E.
7-54-66-4
Pigossi L.
Govortsova O.
6-16-3
Hibino N.
Han N.
4-66-36-1
Grammatikopoulou V.
Kraus S.
6-46-1
Jones F.
Vandeweghe C.
6-36-3
In Albon Y.
Zacarias M.
6-36-0
Yuan Y.
Selekhmeteva O.
6-13-66-2
Hontama M.
Kempen M.
7-56-2
Shymanovich I.
Garland J.
6-46-0
Rouvroy M.
Kenin S.
6-46-3
Andreeva E.
Benoit M.
6-16-1
Gadecki O.
Semenistaja D.
6-06-2
Wickmayer Y.
Konjuh A.
6-36-0
Danilovic O.
Watson H.
6-46-3
Waltert S.
Monnet C.
6-16-3
Dmitruk K.
Mpetshi Perricard D.
6-16-3
Jacquemot E.
Ormaechea P.
6-26-2
Dart H.
Scott K.
6-34-66-4
Avanesyan E.
Astakhova D.
6-16-3
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Romero Gormaz L.
3-67-656-4
Bulgaru M.
Makarova E.
1-66-36-2
Day K.
Jakupovic D.
6-16-1
Vickery S.
Bassols Ribera M.
2-67-616-0
Yastremska D.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
7-56-3
Ruse E.
Cristian J.
6-36-4
Minnen G.
Hobgarski K.
6-46-2