Laura Pigossi vs Elizabeth Mandlik — Sao Paulo Round of 32

Sao Paulo · WTA · Round of 32
BRA
Laura Pigossi
#240WTA
1478ELO
1441Hard ELO
31 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 September 2025
hard
Elizabeth Mandlik
USA
Elizabeth Mandlik
#165WTA
1530ELO
1505Hard ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Pigossi L.
2-6 6-3 6-4
Mandlik E.
Pigossi L.
2662
Mandlik E.
6341

Laura Pigossi defeated Elizabeth Mandlik 2-6 6-3 6-4 in the Sao Paulo round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pigossi L.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Mandlik E.

Mandlik E.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Pigossi L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pigossi L.Mandlik E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
44%
Service points won·Even
53%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.2
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pigossi L.Mandlik E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
39
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
19
11
Break points won·Slight edge
85
95
Deciding sets·Even
67
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pigossi L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mandlik E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.8+64 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1478
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1530
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pigossi L.Mandlik E.
Freshness·Dominant
94
59

Pigossi L.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Mandlik E.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Tjen J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Tjen J.
Jones F.[6]
7-606-3
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Zarazua R.[5]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Jones F.[6]
Sierra S.[2]
6-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Haddad Maia B.[1]
7-656-3
Tjen J.
Eala A.[3]
6-46-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Udvardy P.[8]
6-26-4
R16
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Pigossi L.
6-16-4
Udvardy P.[8]
Candiotto A.
6-36-3
Tjen J.
Okalova M.
6-16-0
Eala A.[3]
Riera J.
6-16-4
Sierra S.[2]
Leme Da Silva N.
6-06-4
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Rodriguez V.
7-56-1
Zarazua R.[5]
Cengiz B.
6-46-4
Jones F.[6]
Osuigwe W.
6-47-66
R32
Rodriguez V.
Tomljanovic A.[4]
6-44-2
Pigossi L.
Mandlik E.
2-66-36-4
Zarazua R.[5]
Fullana L.
6-26-1
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
Sanchez A.
6-44-67-67
Candiotto A.
Strakhova V.
6-35-76-0
Udvardy P.[8]
Rogers A.
6-26-3
Riera J.
Diatchenko V.
6-37-61
Jones F.[6]
Glushko L.
4-66-26-3
Okalova M.
Rodionova A.
7-56-4
Eala A.[3]
Mansouri Y.
6-06-2
Cengiz B.
Ortenzi J.
6-16-2
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Tona M.
6-16-1
Leme Da Silva N.
Alves C.
6-706-26-0
Sierra S.[2]
Hartono A.
7-646-3
Tjen J.
Jeanjean L.[7]
6-26-3
Osuigwe W.
Barros V.
6-36-4