Emma Navarro vs Jil Teichmann — Strasbourg Round of 16

Strasbourg · WTA · Round of 16
Emma Navarro
USA
Emma Navarro
#26WTA
1866ELO
1794Clay ELO
$675kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 May 2023
clay
Jil Teichmann
SUI8
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Navarro E.
2-6 6-3 6-2
Teichmann J.
Navarro E.
2662
Teichmann J.
6321

Emma Navarro defeated Jil Teichmann 2-6 6-3 6-2 in the Strasbourg round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emma Navarro came in ranked #26.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Navarro E.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Navarro E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Navarro E.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Navarro E.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
71
Break points won·Clear edge
99
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
32
Tiebreaks·Even
87
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Navarro E.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Teichmann J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+142 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1653
7.1Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1687
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Navarro E.Teichmann J.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
100

Navarro E.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Teichmann J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Svitolina E.
Blinkova A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Svitolina E.
Burel C.
4-67-56-3
Blinkova A.
Davis L.[7]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Davis L.[7]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
1-67-626-0
Burel C.
Pera B.[4]
6-23-66-4
Blinkova A.
Navarro E.
6-46-4
Svitolina E.
Gracheva V.[6]
6-36-4
R16
Burel C.
Kanepi K.
7-57-60
Svitolina E.
Routliffe E.
W/O
Navarro E.
Teichmann J.[8]
2-66-36-2
Pera B.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-4
Gracheva V.[6]
Janicijevic S.
6-26-1
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Linette M.[1]
6-36-2
Davis L.[7]
Tomova V.
6-43-66-1
Blinkova A.
Friedsam A.
6-47-611
R32
Svitolina E.
Chirico L.
6-47-61
Routliffe E.
Hsieh S.
7-621-66-1
Friedsam A.
Zhang S.[3]
6-06-0
Teichmann J.[8]
Zanevska M.
4-66-36-4
Tomova V.
Cornet A.
3-66-47-5
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Wang X.
6-36-2
Pera B.[4]
Chang S.
6-44-66-1
Janicijevic S.
Dodin O.
2-66-16-4
Birrell K.
Malygina E.
6-26-3
Gracheva V.[6]
Bai Z.
6-33-67-63
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Gabueva A.
6-36-1
Blinkova A.
Hesse A.
4-66-06-4
Linette M.[1]
Bucsa C.
4-66-26-2
Davis L.[7]
Iliev S.
7-56-0
Burel C.
Cirstea S.[5]
7-657-5