Tatjana Maria vs Alexandra Eala — Hua Hin Round of 32

Hua Hin · WTA · Round of 32
Tatjana Maria
GER6
Tatjana Maria
#76WTA
1703ELO
1608Hard ELO
38 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
Alexandra Eala
PHI
Alexandra Eala
#28WTA
1895ELO
1833Hard ELO
$871kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
21 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Maria T.
6-2 6-2
Eala A.
Maria T.
662
Eala A.
220

Tatjana Maria defeated Alexandra Eala 6-2 6-2 in the Hua Hin round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandra Eala came in ranked #28. Tatjana Maria extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-09-18GuangzhouR32hardTatjana Maria6-3 6-0
2023-04-24MadridR128clayTatjana Maria6-1 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Maria T.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Eala A.

Eala A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Maria T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Maria T.Eala A.
9
Serve
20
13
Return
63

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Maria T.Eala A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
50%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Maria T.Eala A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
77
Break points saved·Dominant
31
75
Break points won·Clear edge
78
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Maria T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Eala A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 315 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.0Hard Elo 1608
Surface ELO
8.0+224 Hard Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1895
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Maria T.Eala A.
Freshness·Clear edge
64
84

Maria T.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 81 games (7d) · Eala A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 29 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zhu L.
Tsurenko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Tsurenko L.
Andreescu B.[1]
7-54-0
Zhu L.
Wang X.[7]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Zidansek T.
6-26-2
Wang X.[7]
Watson H.
6-36-766-4
Tsurenko L.
Maria T.[6]
6-16-1
Andreescu B.[1]
Kostyuk M.[5]
6-07-63
R16
Wang X.[7]
Bjorklund M.
6-36-3
Kostyuk M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-37-67
Tsurenko L.
Kalinskaya A.[4]
6-06-736-4
Zidansek T.
Fruhvirtova L.[8]
6-34-66-4
Watson H.
Han N.
6-35-76-4
Zhu L.
Jang S.
6-47-66
Maria T.[6]
Yastremska D.
6-06-4
Andreescu B.[1]
Zakharova A.
6-27-5
R32
Han N.
Ruse E.
6-41-66-4
Jang S.
Boulter K.
6-34-66-3
Kostyuk M.[5]
Liang E.
6-776-36-0
Yastremska D.
Uchijima M.
6-36-736-2
Andreescu B.[1]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Zhu L.
Wang X.[3]
4-66-36-0
Watson H.
Putintseva Y.[2]
5-76-47-65
Maria T.[6]
Eala A.
6-26-2
Zidansek T.
Sharma A.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.[8]
Mattek Sands B.
6-36-1
Kalinskaya A.[4]
Makarova E.
6-16-1
Hibino N.
Savinykh V.
6-06-2
Wang X.[7]
Zuger J.
6-26-2
Tsurenko L.
Bonaventure Y.
6-34-66-4
Bjorklund M.
Tararudee L.
6-26-4
Zakharova A.
Schmiedlova A.
3-67-56-3