Emilio Gomez vs Renzo Olivo — Temuco CH Quarter-final

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
Renzo Olivo
ARG7
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Gomez E.
6-3 3-6 6-2
Olivo R.
Gomez E.
6362
Olivo R.
3621

Emilio Gomez defeated Renzo Olivo 6-3 3-6 6-2 in the Temuco CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Renzo Olivo came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Emilio Gomez claimed a first win over Renzo Olivo in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQ1clayRenzo Olivo6-7(4) 6-3 6-3
2017-02-06QuitoR32clayRenzo Olivo5-7 6-2 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
8
Break points saved·Dominant
77
33
Break points won·Even
19
15
Deciding sets·Even
23
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Olivo R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1